The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10728-021-00437-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three Harm-Based Arguments for a Moral Obligation to Vaccinate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, given that the link between not getting vaccinated and directly harming others is tenuous at best, the case for a moral obligation to get vaccinated is weak to the extent that such an obligation would be grounded in the obligation to avoid harm to others (Ivanković and Savić 2021 ). If harm to others cannot concretely be averted by getting vaccinated, then it difficult to see why one should nevertheless have a moral obligation to get vaccinated based explicitly on a duty to avoid harm to others.…”
Section: Ethical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, given that the link between not getting vaccinated and directly harming others is tenuous at best, the case for a moral obligation to get vaccinated is weak to the extent that such an obligation would be grounded in the obligation to avoid harm to others (Ivanković and Savić 2021 ). If harm to others cannot concretely be averted by getting vaccinated, then it difficult to see why one should nevertheless have a moral obligation to get vaccinated based explicitly on a duty to avoid harm to others.…”
Section: Ethical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, rather than approach other-directed vaccination by establishing putative moral duties, we develop a scalar consequentialist account that recognizes the strength of moral reasons to get vaccinated in view of the central moral good of vaccination, which is to prevent or reduce the chances of causing serious harm to others. In other words, when it comes to the morality of vaccination, harm is the chief moral principle at stake (Ivanković and Savić 2021 ). Our reasons-based account therefore focuses on the harm-based grounds for moral claims.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, given that the link between not getting vaccinated and directly harming others is tenuous at best, the case for a moral obligation to get vaccinated is weak to the extent that such an obligation would be grounded in the obligation to avoid harm to others (Ivanković and Savić 2021). If harm to others cannot concretely be averted by getting vaccinated, then it difficult to see why one should nevertheless have a moral obligation to get vaccinated based explicitly on a duty to avoid harm to others.…”
Section: Ethical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Verweij (2005), for instance, individuals have a moral obligation to take necessary precautions against infection to avoid infecting others, which may entail getting vaccinated. Others have also emphasized the primacy of harm avoidance when it comes to moral duties to get vaccinated (Ivanković and Savić 2021). Harm-based arguments for vaccination duties are often applied to specific populations, for example people who work with vulnerable members of society (e.g., Van Delden et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation