2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11673-022-10223-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ethical Significance of Post-Vaccination COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics

Abstract: The potential for vaccines to prevent the spread of infectious diseases is crucial for vaccination policy and ethics. In this paper, I discuss recent evidence that the current COVID-19 vaccines have only a modest and short-lived effect on reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission and argue that this has at least four important ethical implications. First, getting vaccinated against COVID-19 should be seen primarily as a self-protective choice for individuals. Second, moral condemnation of unvaccinated people for causin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adopting his argument here, if we find that there are pervasive moral intuitions and moral judgments—that is, strong social expectations—about obligations to get vaccinated, then we may simply recognize this state of affairs as providing a(nother) moral reason for vaccination. At the same time, one must be careful not to accept social expectations or widespread moralization as inherently justified; upon careful reflection, even an issue that is commonly perceived as morally charged may be properly understood as being morally neutral (Kraaijeveld 2022 ; Kraaijeveld and Jamrozik 2022 ). Much of the criticism of reasons-based consequentialist approaches has questioned their capacity to systematically ground morality or to displace all traditional moral categories (cf.…”
Section: Scalar Morality and Vaccinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adopting his argument here, if we find that there are pervasive moral intuitions and moral judgments—that is, strong social expectations—about obligations to get vaccinated, then we may simply recognize this state of affairs as providing a(nother) moral reason for vaccination. At the same time, one must be careful not to accept social expectations or widespread moralization as inherently justified; upon careful reflection, even an issue that is commonly perceived as morally charged may be properly understood as being morally neutral (Kraaijeveld 2022 ; Kraaijeveld and Jamrozik 2022 ). Much of the criticism of reasons-based consequentialist approaches has questioned their capacity to systematically ground morality or to displace all traditional moral categories (cf.…”
Section: Scalar Morality and Vaccinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vaccination is one of the most efficient and cost-effective procedures for preventing hospitalization and death from diseases, including COVID-19. Vaccines also play a major role in preventing the transmission of the disease and a modest one in the case of COVID-19 (Kraaijeveld, 2022). Although children and adolescents are less liable to the severe cause of this disease and less likely to die as a result of it (Viner et al, 2021), researchers emphasize the high value of vaccinating young people as they can transmit the infection to people at high risk -the elderly or chronically ill.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes arguments and communication strategies that rely on other-directed effects more difficult than for vaccines that have more robust effects on reducing transmission. The specific effects of particular vaccines are important for the ethics of vaccination policy, especially when coercive measures are involved (Kraaijeveld 2022). Indirect vaccination strategies must also take into account the potential effects of vaccines on reducing transmission and the possibility of achieving herd immunity.…”
Section: Central Findings Concerning Altruistic Vaccinationmentioning
confidence: 99%