2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2012.00291.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three Forms of Interpersonal Trust: Evidence from Swedish Municipalities

Abstract: Social trust is usually treated as a dichotomy between particularized and generalized trust. In this article it is argued that a third distinct form, community trust, is neither particularized nor generalized and bounded in space rather than persons. Factor analysis of survey data from 33 Swedish municipalities (N = 6,453) distinguishes between particularized, generalized and community trust. Furthermore, regression analyses show that the three trust forms have partly distinct antecedents and linked to differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
53
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous paper Wollebaek et al, (2012) argued that this confusion may partially originate from the use of different methods for conceptualising and measuring trust. The purpose of this article is to build on this previous work and examine in greater detail the ways in which trust is affected by diversity in the local community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous paper Wollebaek et al, (2012) argued that this confusion may partially originate from the use of different methods for conceptualising and measuring trust. The purpose of this article is to build on this previous work and examine in greater detail the ways in which trust is affected by diversity in the local community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some argue that both forms of trust are sometimes incompatible (Uslaner 2008a), others believe that one does not necessarily lead to the other (Hooghe 2008), and others are of the view that they are perfectly compatible or mutually reinforcing (Freitag and Traunmüller 2009). Recently, Wollebaek, Lundåsen, and Trägårdh (2012) have argued that community trust is of greater relevance in terms of its behavioural consequences, given that ! they suggest !…”
Section: Trust Immigration and Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is clearly not a perfect indicator of particularized trust, as neighbours often do not all know each other and, in any case, the usual question asked does not make reference to particular neighbours but rather to the community as a whole (Veenstra 2002;Wollebaek, Lundåsen, and Trägårdh 2012). Not surprisingly, therefore, trust in neighbours and trust in people living in the neighbourhood tend to load on multiple dimensions of trust indicators (Uslaner 2002;Newton and Zmerli 2011).…”
Section: Trust Immigration and Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations