“…The ambition to move beyond cross-national comparisons and highlight nontrivial within-country differences regarding violations of the norm of impartiality is a most welcome initiative. This literature is clearly relevant for, and has the potential to theoretically inform, many of the recent interesting studies on corruption and trust in local government in low-corrupt countries (see, for instance, Bergh, Fink, & Öhrvall, 2017;Masters & Graycar, 2016;Kristinsson, 2015;Wallman Lundåsen & Wollebaek, 2013;Dahlström & Sundell, 2013;Jiménez, 2009;Erlingsson, Bergh, & Sjölin, 2009;Lidström, 2008). That said, to be able to make the claim that impartiality of subnational institutions is responsible for variations in social trust among citizens, empirical analyses need to be more sensitive to varying constitutional designs of the countries that are analyzed, so that relevant institutions are matched with the level of analysis where data are collected.…”