2010 Conference Record of the Forty Fourth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers 2010
DOI: 10.1109/acssc.2010.5757585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three engines to solve verification constraints of decimal Floating-Point operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One advantage of the proposed algorithm, is that it does not require bit level analysis or creating Cartesian equations and developing a particular engine to solve these equations as in [2], [3], [5], [10], [11]. Our constraints are word level constraints and are applied on existing SV constraint solvers.…”
Section: Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One advantage of the proposed algorithm, is that it does not require bit level analysis or creating Cartesian equations and developing a particular engine to solve these equations as in [2], [3], [5], [10], [11]. Our constraints are word level constraints and are applied on existing SV constraint solvers.…”
Section: Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is basically the internal algorithm of FPgen tool that the author develops to verify addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. [10] and [11] use similar approach by creating their own engines to solve simultaneously constraints on unbounded intermediate results and constraints on inputs-outputs. This methodology has proven effectiveness in verifying AdditionSubtraction, Multiplication and Fused Multiply Add operations for Decimal FP units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The freely available test vectors from Cairo University [82] were successful also in detecting errors in various designs [51,67,83] as well as in software libraries.…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cairo University in cooperation with SilMinds developed an alternative engine. This verification work [21] included a DFP set of models compliant with the IEEE 754-2008 standard and a model-based test case generator with the same format as IBM's. We built a free tool [22] to parse the test cases generated from either Cairo University or IBM to produce output files with test vectors suitable for direct use with hardware simulators.…”
Section: Dfp Hardware Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%