Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional ultrasonographic assessment of peripheral enthesitis in spondylarthritis

Abstract

To compare the intra- and interobserver reliability of three-dimensional (3D) volumetric versus conventional two-dimensional (2D) power Doppler ultrasonography (US) in the assessment of peripheral enthesitis in spondylarthritis (SpA). Sixteen patients with SpA according to ASAS criteria were included. Two rheumatologists (one experimented in musculoskeletal US (sonographer 1) and one beginner (sonographer 2)) performed independently a 2D US scoring of the enthesis using the Madrid Sonographic Enthesis Index score followed by a 3D acquisition of the same entheseal sites. The reading of the 3D acquisition was performed a minimum of 1 week apart. Intraobserver reliability was evaluated by a second reading of the same images. The duration of 2D US scanning, 3D US acquisition and reading was recorded. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for the reliability analysis. Intraobserver reproducibility was good to excellent for 2D US and good for 3D US (ICC (95 %CI) 2D US 0.776 (0.471-0.916) and 0.96 (0.892-0.986) and ICC (95 %CI) 3D US 0.796 (0.498-0.921) and 0.703 (0.325-0.886) for sonographer 1 and 2, respectively). Interobserver reliability was slightly better for 3D US than for 2D US (ICC (95 %CI) 0.776 (0.471-0.916) for 3D US versus 0.641 (0.221-0.859) for 2D US). The mean time (±SD) for 2D US scanning was 23 min (±4) whereas the mean time for 3D US volume acquisition and reading was 16.5 min (±2.6) (p < 0.001). 3D US showed good intra- and interobserver reliability in the assessment of enthesitis in SpA and shortened the needed time for scanning. It can be performed by a nonexperienced examiner without loss of reliability.

Subclinical enthesitis in nail psoriasis patients: a case‐control study

“…To compensate for this potential error, we used 3D US, which has a number of advantages over conventional two‐dimensional US . A major advantage of 3D US is that it reduces the dependence on the sonographer's expertise in positioning the probe, as it scans in a standard manner , and allows for scanning multiple entheses in one session.” “Our results confirm that it is a reliable technique, showing good interrater reliability in the visualization of entheses .” “Nevertheless, a limitation of using this technique in the present study was the number of missing data. This was mainly due to technical limitations of the 3D US transducer for the visualization of musculoskeletal structures of the hand.…”

Ultrasound of knee osteoarthritis: interobserver agreement and correlation with Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis

“…Application of threedimensional ultrasound [39] and power flow Doppler ultrasound [40] will increase the diagnostic validity of ultrasound of knee osteoarthritis in the future.…”

Can power Doppler ultrasound of the entheses help in classifying recent axial spondyloarthritis? Data from the DESIR cohort

“…In earlier studies, the prevalence of PDUS enthesitis varied widely from 0% at the Achilles tendon, 23 in 16 patients meeting axial and peripheral ASAS criteria for SpA and having a symptom duration of 10 years, 6% in 36 patients, 24 meeting modified New York criteria for SpA, 47% in 197 patients meeting ESSG or Amor’s criteria for SpA 25 and 76% in 118 patients with suspected SpA among whom 51 were finally diagnosed with SpA based on expert opinion. 14 Possible sources of these discrepancies include major differences in the patient populations, quality of the ultrasound machine, variations in the definition of enthesitis detected by PDUS, disease duration (which ranged from 2 to 10 years), number of entheses evaluated and, perhaps, experience of the sonographers.…”