2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11325-011-0610-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional reconstruction of soft palate modeling from subject-specific magnetic resonance imaging data

Abstract: The same procedure was used to build up a generic reference model of the dentition, tongue, mandible and airway from a mixture of medical records (CT and dental casts) of the same subject. This manual segmentation method eliminated the common errors that occur from an automatic segmentation although it was more time-consuming. It remains a fundamental process for analyzing the dynamic interaction between anatomical components in the oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal areas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have reported FEM-based models of the soft palate (e.g., Berry et al 1999; Chen et al 2012) and the jaw–tongue–hyoid complex (e.g., Gerard et al 2006; Stavness et al 2011, 2012). The present work extends this work by extensively modifying the soft palate model of Chen et al (2012), and fitting it to the jaw–tongue–hyoid model of Stavness et al (2011, 2012), with the particular goal of observing interactions between the soft palate and tongue in the region of the OPI. The resulting combined model, built using Artisynth (www.artisynth.org), an open-source FEM simulation toolkit, is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have reported FEM-based models of the soft palate (e.g., Berry et al 1999; Chen et al 2012) and the jaw–tongue–hyoid complex (e.g., Gerard et al 2006; Stavness et al 2011, 2012). The present work extends this work by extensively modifying the soft palate model of Chen et al (2012), and fitting it to the jaw–tongue–hyoid model of Stavness et al (2011, 2012), with the particular goal of observing interactions between the soft palate and tongue in the region of the OPI. The resulting combined model, built using Artisynth (www.artisynth.org), an open-source FEM simulation toolkit, is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial soft palate geometry of Chen et al (2012) was morphed with reference to the geometries of the skull, tongue, and surrounding structures. The initial morph was done algorithmically, but additional modifications were made by hand (such as enforcing symmetry to the midsagittal plane).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soft palate region was analyzed in several works. Chen et al [6] extracted a computational three-dimensional (3D) soft palate model from a set of MRI data to generate a patientspecific model. The segmentation was performed manually.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,9,12,13,[27][28][29][30] Further, volumetric analysis is recommended in people with OSA to localize areas of airway obstruction and to characterize complex tissues with higher accuracy and reproducibility than linear or 2D measurements. [21][22][23] Volumetric studies using CT or MRI and automated imageprocessing algorithms for fat and complex tissue quantification permit collection of highly quantitative data of pharyngeal structures, allowing more accurate and individualized diagnosis and treatment. [21][22][23][24][25][26] The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the volumetric dimensions of the tongue and tongue fat in BC and mesaticephalic (MC) dogs using multiplanar CT images and specialized volumetric software.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] Volumetric studies using CT or MRI and automated imageprocessing algorithms for fat and complex tissue quantification permit collection of highly quantitative data of pharyngeal structures, allowing more accurate and individualized diagnosis and treatment. [21][22][23][24][25][26] The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the volumetric dimensions of the tongue and tongue fat in BC and mesaticephalic (MC) dogs using multiplanar CT images and specialized volumetric software. We hypothesized the tongues of BC dogs would be of greater volume with greater fat deposition compared to MC dogs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%