2008
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional radiative transfer models of clumpy tori in Seyfert galaxies

Abstract: Context. Tori of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) are made up of a mixture of hot and cold gas, as well as dust. In order to protect the dust grains from destruction by the surrounding hot gas as well as by the energetic (UV/optical) radiation from the accretion disk, the dust is often assumed to be distributed in clouds. Aims. A new three-dimensional model of AGN dust tori is extensively investigated. The torus is modelled as a wedge-shaped disk within which dusty clouds are randomly distributed throughout the vo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
267
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
17
267
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, silicate emission features in type 1 AGN are much weaker than expected from early torus models, which used smooth dust distributions. As shown in the literature, this might be explained by clumpiness of the dust in the torus, which leads to an overall suppression of the emission feature (Nenkova et al 2002;Dullemond & van Bemmel 2005;Hönig et al 2006;Schartmann et al 2008;Nenkova et al 2008;Hönig & Kishimoto 2010). However, as will be shown in the second paper of this series (Hönig & Kishimoto 2010, pre-print available on astro-ph), weak emission features are not a generic property of clumpy torus models but might be used to constrain some model parameters of the dust distribution in clumpy tori.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, silicate emission features in type 1 AGN are much weaker than expected from early torus models, which used smooth dust distributions. As shown in the literature, this might be explained by clumpiness of the dust in the torus, which leads to an overall suppression of the emission feature (Nenkova et al 2002;Dullemond & van Bemmel 2005;Hönig et al 2006;Schartmann et al 2008;Nenkova et al 2008;Hönig & Kishimoto 2010). However, as will be shown in the second paper of this series (Hönig & Kishimoto 2010, pre-print available on astro-ph), weak emission features are not a generic property of clumpy torus models but might be used to constrain some model parameters of the dust distribution in clumpy tori.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Clumpy torus models based on ISM dust well reproduce the overall IR dust reemission and the silicate absorption features in detail (e.g. Hönig et al 2006Polletta et al 2008;Schartmann et al 2008). For type 1 AGN, the situation is less clear.…”
Section: The N-band Silicate Feature In Agn At High Spatial Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…When discussing these models, it's important to keep in mind that the accuracy or applicability of these models cannot be tested with data since it simply does not exist in enough detail to disentangle effects of geometry, distribution, optical depth, etc. It's also important to note that many have done work in this area, particularly modeling radiative transfer in local starburst populations to generate SEDs (Efstathiou & Rowan-Robinson, 1995;Efstathiou et al, 2000;Efstathiou & Siebenmorgen, 2009;Nenkova et al, 2002;Dullemond & van Bemmel, 2005;Piovan et al, 2006;Nenkova et al, 2008;Takagi et al, 2003;Fritz et al, 2006;Hönig et al, 2006;Schartmann et al, 2008), but here we try to focus on the techniques which have been most commonly employed for SED fitting of high-z dusty starbursts 11 . Silva et al (1998) developed the Grasil code to model galaxy emission by explicitly accounting for dust absorption and emission from the ultraviolet through to the far-infrared.…”
Section: Employing Dust Radiative Transfer Models and Empirical Templmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists broad agreement that the AGN-heated nuclear dust is mainly located in clumps which are distributed in a toroidal pattern altogether referred to as the AGN torus (e.g. Nenkova et al 2002;Kuraszkiewicz et al 2003;Hönig et al 2006;Schartmann et al 2008). To account for the emission from the AGN heated dust, we chose the library of torus models from Hönig & Kishimoto (2010).…”
Section: Fitting Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%