2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional polarized Monte Carlo atmospheric radiative transfer model (3DMCPOL): 3D effects on polarized visible reflectances of a cirrus cloud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(19) is indeed similar in structure to the schemes utilised in some FMC algorithms (e.g. Bartel & Hielscher 2000;Bianchi et al 1996;Cornet et al 2010;Fischer et al 1994;Hopcraft et al 2000;Kastner 1966;Schmid 1992;Whitney 2011).…”
Section: The Classical Sampling Schemementioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(19) is indeed similar in structure to the schemes utilised in some FMC algorithms (e.g. Bartel & Hielscher 2000;Bianchi et al 1996;Cornet et al 2010;Fischer et al 1994;Hopcraft et al 2000;Kastner 1966;Schmid 1992;Whitney 2011).…”
Section: The Classical Sampling Schemementioning
confidence: 71%
“…FMC algorithms easily account for the photon's polarisation state in the sampling of the photon propagation direction following a collision (e.g. Bartel & Hielscher 2000;Bianchi et al 1996;Cornet et al 2010;Fischer et al 1994;Hopcraft et al 2000;Kastner 1966;Schmid 1992;Whitney 2011). That is not immediately possible in BMC algorithms because the scattering events are treated in the reverse order that they actually occur.…”
Section: The Bmc Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will now describe the polarized version, which can calculate the Stokes vector S = (I, Q, U, V) (Chandrasekhar, 1960) [24]. The applied technique is based on the -local estimation‖ MC and follows the technique that has been described in detail in a paper by Cornet et al (2010) [16]. There are two differences in the vector approach compared to the scalar one.…”
Section: Applied MC Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first difference is related to the fact that the scattering azimuth angle of a photon now is not a uniformly distributed random value between 0° and 180° degrees but depends on the initial polarization state and the scattering zenith angle. To overcome this difficulty we applied an algorithm suggested by Cornet et al (2010) [16]. The second difficulty is related to the fact that the scattering plane rotates after each scattering so that it takes to perform a pair of rotations between the meridian and this planes.…”
Section: Applied MC Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation