2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional numerical simulations of straight-bladed vertical axis tidal turbines investigating power output, torque ripple and mounting forces

Abstract: Three straight-bladed vertical axis turbine designs were simulated using ThreeDimensional (3D) transient Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models, using a commercial Unsteady Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS). The turbine designs differed in support strut section, blade-strut joint design and strut location to evaluate their effect on power output, torque fluctuation levels and mounting forces. Simulations of power output were performed and validated against Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD), with resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
54
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the 2D CFD model cannot reflect all the hydrodynamic characteristics of the VAT and will ignore some parasitic drag forces [30], it has been pointed out that the 2D model is suitable for the initial study to save computational cost and time [23]. Considering that the numerical simulation of the self-starting of a VAT is still in a preliminary stage, we decided to use the 2D model in this study.…”
Section: Numerical Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the 2D CFD model cannot reflect all the hydrodynamic characteristics of the VAT and will ignore some parasitic drag forces [30], it has been pointed out that the 2D model is suitable for the initial study to save computational cost and time [23]. Considering that the numerical simulation of the self-starting of a VAT is still in a preliminary stage, we decided to use the 2D model in this study.…”
Section: Numerical Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These 2D models are often used due to their significantly reduced computational requirements when compared to Three-Dimensional (3D) models. However, these 2D approaches often significantly over predict maximum power output [4][5][6][7] due to the highly 3D nature of turbine hydrodynamic flow due to blade and strut joint and blade tip losses [8]. Numerical simulations are also commonly performed using fully turbulent models [4][5][6][7][8], again due to their computational efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these 2D approaches often significantly over predict maximum power output [4][5][6][7] due to the highly 3D nature of turbine hydrodynamic flow due to blade and strut joint and blade tip losses [8]. Numerical simulations are also commonly performed using fully turbulent models [4][5][6][7][8], again due to their computational efficiency. However, the influence of laminar-to-turbulent flow transition on power output predictions is unknown, and may be significant as turbines can operate in low Reynolds number dominated flows [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, hydrodynamics of cross-flow turbines are very complex due to three different reasons, which cause uncertainty, complex turbulence and flow separation: 1-Changing of angle of attack during each turn. 2-Influence of aerofoil fluctuations on each other, 3-Influence of connecting arms on flow field [3].In cross flow turbines, at low rotational speeds, change of angle of attack effectively alters turbine performance and causes static and dynamic stalls [4]. On the other hand, the performance of the turbine at high speeds is influenced by flow turbulence, turbulence created by the aerofoils, and interactions caused by both of them [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%