Three-dimensional Morphology of the Knee Reveals Ethnic Differences

Abstract

BackgroundStudies have demonstrated sex differences in femoral shape and quadriceps angle raising a question of whether implant design should be sex-specific. Much of this research has addressed shape differences within the Caucasian population and little is known about differences among ethnic groups.Questions/purposesWe therefore asked: Do shape differences in the distal femur and proximal tibia exist among different ethnic groups and between the sexes in each ethnic population? And if ethnic differences exist, do they have a clinical impact on current TKA design?Subjects and MethodsWe analyzed 1000 normal adult knees (80 African American, 80 East Asian, and 860 Caucasian). Three-dimensional surface models were created for each bone and added to three-dimensional statistical bone atlases. Statistical shape analysis was conducted with a process combining principal components and multiple discriminate analyses. Eleven femoral and nine tibial measurements were calculated.ResultsWe found differences in mean measurements between the sexes and ethnicities. Males had larger knees, with a mean 5-mm-larger anteroposterior dimension than females in all ethnicities. African American females had a 7.4-mm-deeper patellar groove, 2.3-mm-smaller tibial mediolateral dimension, and 2.5-mm-larger tibial anteroposterior dimension than Caucasian females. African American males had a 4.3-mm-larger femoral anteroposterior dimension, 10.1-mm-larger tibial mediolateral dimension, and 6-mm-larger tibial anteroposterior dimension than Asian males.ConclusionsWe identified differences in three-dimensional knee morphology among Caucasian, African American, and East Asian populations. Clinical studies will be required to determine whether these differences are important for implant design.

An anatomical and osteometric study of the femoral sulcus angle in adult Malawians

“…For this reason, observations of the present study suggest that the size of the sulcus angle cannot determine sex in Malawians. This supports earlier studies that have reported that sexual dimorphism is race and population specific 10,14, [20][21][22][23] . Additionally, it has been observed in our study that the mean femoral sulcus angles for males combined and females combined are 142. .…”

Determination of Sex Based on the Morphometric Evaluation of the Proximal Tibia

“…Moreover, the differences were not uniform, as the difference in some measurements had a broader range than other measurements. The main findings was the larger values for the male tibias compared to the female tibias, which is in agreement with data described in the literature (Mahfouz et al, 2012;Lim et al, 2013;Gandhi et al). * Statistically significant difference between male and female tibias using Mann-Whitney test ** Statistically significant difference between male and female tibias using Student's t-test Table I.…”

Analysis of total knee replacements in a South Indian Institute

“…This may be attributed to the splay of the medio-lateral dimension of the distal femur and proximal tibia and comparatively delayed presentation for replacement from the onset of symptoms. 18,19 80% of the operated knees had fixed bearing curved plus insert which might have been the preferred choice of the operating surgeon to enhance stability. 41% of the operated knees had size 10 polyethylene tibial insert followed by 12.5 size in 22.9%.…”