2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18041077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Modeling of Weed Plants Using Low-Cost Photogrammetry

Abstract: Sensing advances in plant phenotyping are of vital importance in basic and applied plant research. Plant phenotyping enables the modeling of complex shapes, which is useful, for example, in decision-making for agronomic management. In this sense, 3D processing algorithms for plant modeling is expanding rapidly with the emergence of new sensors and techniques designed to morphologically characterize. However, there are still some technical aspects to be improved, such as an accurate reconstruction of end-detail… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, differently from SfM imagery analysis based on a manual acquisition system [25,54], our platform is able to automatically acquire images and, thus, gather a pre-defined number of overlapped images, avoiding human mistakes (i.e., images out of focus and lack of scene features) [55]. Although the SfM methodology has been widely adopted for low-cost and accurate 3D plant modelling [33,34], only a few studies have focused on optimization of the reconstruction process in relation to different canopy architectures, even if they have been mainly fed with a fixed number of images of the same quality [40,56]. However, this approach prevented investigating the best input combination for an efficient modelling of each species, which is an essential reference for a practical application of SfM in agronomic and breeding programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, differently from SfM imagery analysis based on a manual acquisition system [25,54], our platform is able to automatically acquire images and, thus, gather a pre-defined number of overlapped images, avoiding human mistakes (i.e., images out of focus and lack of scene features) [55]. Although the SfM methodology has been widely adopted for low-cost and accurate 3D plant modelling [33,34], only a few studies have focused on optimization of the reconstruction process in relation to different canopy architectures, even if they have been mainly fed with a fixed number of images of the same quality [40,56]. However, this approach prevented investigating the best input combination for an efficient modelling of each species, which is an essential reference for a practical application of SfM in agronomic and breeding programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some technical aspects need to be improved to resolve the uncertainties in the estimation of traits (i.e., stem diameters and leaf area) when increases in images' quantity and quality are not enough. In this context, low distances between sensor and plant [56] coupled with an increase in height and inclination of the camera, could be a cost-effective solution for reducing errors in canopy disclosure, keeping the potential of the zenith-point-of-view image acquisition system in vertical measurements unchanged. Nevertheless, errors can also be attributable to a manual and non-automatic extraction of the traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on multiview RGB-D 3D reconstruction, the change of the initial reference point cloud would affect the projection morphology of the canopy point cloud on the XOY and YOZ planes, but the projection of the tomato canopy on the XOZ horizontal plane was not affected by the initial point cloud view. The XOZ horizontal plane projection boundary enclosing area is an invariant feature quantity, and the projection boundary enclosing area was calculated as shown in Equation (12). The 3D shape of a tomato canopy is complex.…”
Section: Calculation Methods Of 3d Point Cloud Morphological Charactermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, monocular vision has relatively low applicability. Multiview reconstruction techniques based on monocular vision mainly include space carving [9], visual structure from motion system techniques [10,11], multiview photogrammetry [12,13], and multicamera synchronous reconstruction [14]. However, these techniques require many angles of view (AOVs) for measurement and are unable to meet the reconstruction efficiency requirement for high-throughput plant phenotyping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the principle of stereo vision [30,31], it is necessary to match the corresponding points from two images in order to obtain the 3D thickness information from 2D images [32]. But due to the fact that the shape of rice is similar to each other and the surface texture is scarce, it is impossible to realize matching directly using the traditional matching algorithm [33], which greatly increases the difficulty of extracting rice thickness from images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%