2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00707-016-1666-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional micromechanical analysis of the CNT waviness influence on the mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polymer nanocomposites embedded with nanoparticles such as CNTs, graphene and their derivatives, nanoclays, and silica nanoparticles have attracted a large amount of attention to achieve more improved thermomechanical properties than conventional composites . Among all others, CNTs have been emerged as the ideal candidates for multifarious applications due to their remarkable thermoelastic and physical properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymer nanocomposites embedded with nanoparticles such as CNTs, graphene and their derivatives, nanoclays, and silica nanoparticles have attracted a large amount of attention to achieve more improved thermomechanical properties than conventional composites . Among all others, CNTs have been emerged as the ideal candidates for multifarious applications due to their remarkable thermoelastic and physical properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, unit cell-based micromechanical models assume regular fiber arrangement. 30,32,38,39 Figure 1 illustrates the RVE of the MMC, which consists of three phases, including unidirectional SiC fiber, Ti matrix, and the interphase layer between the fiber and matrix. The selected RVE consists of 3 × 3×1 rectangular sub-cells in which L h , L c , and L r are the lengths of RVE in the z, x , and y directions, respectively.…”
Section: Geometry Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, the simulation techniques including micromechanical analytical (Baxter and Robinson, 2011; Cannillo et al, 2006; Ji et al, 2010; Kundalwal and Meguid, 2015; Nafar Dastgerdi et al, 2013; Odegard et al, 2005; Ray and Kundalwal, 2014; Snipes et al, 2011; Sun et al, 2011) and finite element (Kulkarni et al, 2010; Kundalwal and Ray, 2012; Lusti and Gusev, 2004; Sun et al, 2011; Wang et al, 2005) methods are proposed to predict the material properties of polymer nanocomposites. In the category of unit cell micromechanics models, method of cell (MOC) (Dhala and Ray, 2015; Hassanzadeh-Aghdam et al, 2017; Lusti and Gusev, 2004), generalized method of cell (GMG) (Baxter and Robinson, 2011; Fralick et al, 2012; Snipes et al, 2011), and simplified unit cell (SUC) (Ansari et al, 2016a; Ansari and Hassanzadeh-Aghdam, 2016a, 2016b; Falahatgar et al, 2009; Hassanzadeh-Aghdam et al, 2018) have been successfully used to determine the mechanical and thermal properties of nanocomposite materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%