2018
DOI: 10.1364/oe.26.033166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional localization microscopy using deep learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The precisions obtained with SALM/DONALD+ will thus be generally better, but can only be achieved in practice when the localization estimator considers PSF shapes as well. A maximum-likelihood algorithm operating on an accurate PSF model is a suitable choice in this regard [30,31]. We note that SALM/DONALD+, i.e.…”
Section: Results From Precision Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The precisions obtained with SALM/DONALD+ will thus be generally better, but can only be achieved in practice when the localization estimator considers PSF shapes as well. A maximum-likelihood algorithm operating on an accurate PSF model is a suitable choice in this regard [30,31]. We note that SALM/DONALD+, i.e.…”
Section: Results From Precision Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This step is required to facilitate a meaningful comparison between the outputs of our single-emitter estimator and the theoretical precisions. A home-programmed maximum likelihood algorithm [31] was subsequently employed to estimate 3D positions, signals and background levels of each localization from molecule images measuring 13×13 pixels. The PSF used by the MLE algorithm was calculated according to Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For benchmarking, we compare our vectorial PR (VIPR) to two alternatives: (1) analytically optimizing (with our method) the scalar diffraction model and (2) adding Zernike polynomials to the initially designed phase mask using the vectorial model [21,34]. Note that using Zernike polynomials requires an additional step to address observed wobble, by fitting the z-stack with the initial guessed mask to center it; this only works when the initial guess is close to the actual mask.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the typical case of PR from a z-stack of a bead on the coverslip surface, these correspond to different values of . Common examples of cost functions include the L1 [34] and L2 [24] norms. Other cost functions employ statistical estimation, e.g.…”
Section: Cost Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation