2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.01.02.892661
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VIPR: Vectorial Implementation of Phase Retrieval for fast and accurate microscopic pixel-wise pupil estimation

Abstract: In microscopy, proper modeling of the image formation has a substantial effect on the precision and accuracy in localization experiments and facilitates the correction of aberrations in adaptive optics experiments. The observed images are subject to polarization effects, refractive index variations and system specific constraints. Previously reported techniques have addressed these challenges by using complicated calibration samples, computationally heavy numerical algorithms, and various mathematical simplifi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This demonstrates that a PHASENET model trained only on synthetic images can indeed generalize to experimental data and achieve better performance than classical methods. Interestingly, although this dataset uses a high numerical aperture objective, PHASENET achieves high accuracy despite using only a scalar PSF model (2) which neglects vectorial effects in the PSF simulation [ 17 ]. Crucially, predictions with PHASENET were obtained orders of magnitude faster than with both GS and ZOLA (cf.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This demonstrates that a PHASENET model trained only on synthetic images can indeed generalize to experimental data and achieve better performance than classical methods. Interestingly, although this dataset uses a high numerical aperture objective, PHASENET achieves high accuracy despite using only a scalar PSF model (2) which neglects vectorial effects in the PSF simulation [ 17 ]. Crucially, predictions with PHASENET were obtained orders of magnitude faster than with both GS and ZOLA (cf.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical approaches to phase retrieval include alternating projection methods such as Gerchberg-Saxton (GS) [ 11 , 15 ] or parameterized PSF fitting methods such as ZOLA [ 16 ] or VIPR [ 17 ]. While projection methods are typically fast but can perform poorly especially for noisy images, PSF fitting methods can achieve excellent results yet are relatively slow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging system schematic and alignment and calibration procedures; characterization of raPol's detection and estimation performance; additional NR orientation-localization analysis; additional references. 64,65 The data underlying this study are openly available in OSF at https://osf.io/ 64bfv/?view_only=3a2cbdc3fd20467486f3574d54ecc7f6 and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.…”
Section: Supporting Information Availablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 µms), we first generate a synthetic z-stack comprised of the approximate in-focus Airy disk PSF A (x, y) at 200 nm steps. Afterwards, we use stochastic gradient descent iterations with importance sampling [72] to recover the phase mask M associated with this PSF. Let D be the diffraction limit for the assumed optical setup.…”
Section: Edof Psf Designmentioning
confidence: 99%