SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2005 2005
DOI: 10.1190/1.2144386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three Dimensional Imaging of Marine CSEM Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While one-dimensional (1D) modeling and inversion is relatively easy and trial and error 3D forward modeling seemingly straight forward (Hoversten et al 2006;4 Weiss & Constable 2006, Green et al, 2005, the need for 3D imaging is necessary as the search for hydrocarbons now increasingly occurs in highly complex situations where hydrocarbon effects are subtle aspects of the total offshore geological environment. Further complicating matters is the realization that electrical anisotropy also needs to be incorporated directly into the imaging process Carazzone et al 2008;Jing et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While one-dimensional (1D) modeling and inversion is relatively easy and trial and error 3D forward modeling seemingly straight forward (Hoversten et al 2006;4 Weiss & Constable 2006, Green et al, 2005, the need for 3D imaging is necessary as the search for hydrocarbons now increasingly occurs in highly complex situations where hydrocarbon effects are subtle aspects of the total offshore geological environment. Further complicating matters is the realization that electrical anisotropy also needs to be incorporated directly into the imaging process Carazzone et al 2008;Jing et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operating frequencies of transmitters in CSEM may range between 0.1 and 10 Hz, and the choice depends on the dimensions of a model. In most studies, typical frequencies vary from 0.25 to 1 Hz, which means that for source-receiver offsets of 1012 km, the penetration depth of the method can extend to several kilometres below the seabed [1], [4], [5], [15]. The disadvantage of marine CSEM is its relatively low resolution compared to seismic imaging.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As EM measurements enable a distinction between highly resistive bodies and their surrounding structures, the method attracted the attention of the oil industry because hydrocarbon reservoirs are far more resistive than brine-filled formations. As reported by many authors, controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) measurements may indicate the presence of hydrocarbons Ellingsrud et al, 2002;Amundsen et al, 2004;Carazzone et al, 2005;Srnka et al, 2006;Choo et al, 2006;Darnet et al, 2007;MacGregor et al, 2007 Marine CSEM surveys typically employ a high-powered electric source close to the seafloor to induce low-frequency EM signals that penetrate into the subsurface. An array of EM receivers placed on the seafloor records the horizontal electric and magnetic field components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%