2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11770-018-0688-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional gravity inversion based on sparse recovery iteration using approximate zero norm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recovering the pattern of real Moho structures becomes even more difficult in some locations with extreme undulation, which is an inherent restriction of gravimetric inversion. At the moment, several studies have made progress on recovering the discontinuous interface geometry using the LP ${L}_{P}$ inversion (Feng et al., 2019; Meng et al., 2018; Santos et al., 2015; Sun & Li, 2014).…”
Section: Synthetic Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recovering the pattern of real Moho structures becomes even more difficult in some locations with extreme undulation, which is an inherent restriction of gravimetric inversion. At the moment, several studies have made progress on recovering the discontinuous interface geometry using the LP ${L}_{P}$ inversion (Feng et al., 2019; Meng et al., 2018; Santos et al., 2015; Sun & Li, 2014).…”
Section: Synthetic Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inversion methods that utilize a smooth stabilizer produce model typically characterized by smooth features, and hence have difficulties in recovering blocky structures or non-smooth distributions that have sharp boundaries or abrupt changes in physical properties (Farquharson, 2008). To overcome this problem, non-smooth stabilizers that help to produce compact and sharp models have been applied successfully (Zhdanov, 2009;Meng et al, 2018). Since we are interested in developing a gravity inversion method that can produce compact and sharp models, we use a non-smooth stabilizer through the L 0 -norm on the model parameters and will be discussed in the next subsection.…”
Section: Inverse Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many procedures such as gradient projection approach (Wang & Ma, 2007;Lelièvre et al, 2009), transform function approach (Pilkington, 2008) and logarithmic barrier approach (Li & Oldenburg, 2003) have been applied in different inversion schemes to implement this constraint. However, with regard to L 0norm stabilizer based gravity inversion methods an effective method is the direct utilization of lower and upper density constraint (Meng et al, 2018). Hence, in this work the direct density bound inequality constraint is used, that is at each iteration density contrast of each rectangular block is bounded by minimum and maximum density constraint function given by:…”
Section: Physical Parameter Inequality Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, considering that the original DE failed to obtain a smooth model, we designed a new mutation strategy to solve this problem. Although the inversion regularized with l p norm has been widely solved by applying the gradient-based methods [40][41][42][43][44], the application of adaptive DE in the physical property of magnetic data is studied for the first time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%