2017
DOI: 10.3856/vol45-issue2-fulltext-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three dimensional connectivity in the Gulf of California: an online interactive webpage

Abstract: ABSTRACT. This paper presents an online interactive webpage [http://connectivity-dispersion.cicese.mx/] that provides users with results of both the three-dimensional connectivity and spatial dispersion of particles in the Gulf of California (GC). These results were originated by means of a three-dimensional numerical model of circulation adapted to the GC from which the advection of particles were generated between different regions of the gulf. Particle connectivity and dispersion results were generated for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geostrophic estimates show distinct two-way flow near bottom between PB and AR with a Pacific-ward flow to the east and inflows to the west [ 52 ]; thus, two-way larval exchange is possible, and the 75 km distance between PB and AR vent fields lies within the average dispersal distances for most worm, clam and crustacean larvae [ 18 , 53 , 54 ]. While the recent Lagrangian connectivity model of Montaño-Cortés et al [ 55 ] does not encompass the AR field, it illustrates particles crossing basin boundaries with some vertical component in four- and eight-week runs. Thus, the distinction of macrofauna between PB and AR locales suggests that community composition is related less to geographical proximity and larval supply than to habitat suitability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geostrophic estimates show distinct two-way flow near bottom between PB and AR with a Pacific-ward flow to the east and inflows to the west [ 52 ]; thus, two-way larval exchange is possible, and the 75 km distance between PB and AR vent fields lies within the average dispersal distances for most worm, clam and crustacean larvae [ 18 , 53 , 54 ]. While the recent Lagrangian connectivity model of Montaño-Cortés et al [ 55 ] does not encompass the AR field, it illustrates particles crossing basin boundaries with some vertical component in four- and eight-week runs. Thus, the distinction of macrofauna between PB and AR locales suggests that community composition is related less to geographical proximity and larval supply than to habitat suitability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seasonal signals of the currents are the same every year, but the phase of the spring–neap cycles changes annually. Thus, the trajectories of larvae are dominated by seasonal circulation, and the tides produce oscillations only during the planktonic larval period (Montaño‐Cortés et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%