2005
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2005.850816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional analysis of scattering losses due to sidewall roughness in microphotonic waveguides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
151
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
151
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This loss is significantly higher than previously reported for silicon photonic devices due to our reliance on deposited polysilicon that has not been optimized for photonics. The top surface roughness of end-of-line polysilicon is approximately 6-8 nm rms with a correlation length of 100-200 nm as measured by TEM, which is consistent with theory [41]. Still, the measured Q is suitable for devices such as ringresonator WDM filters and modulators designed for 10 Gb/s datacom.…”
Section: Photonic Device Performance Analysissupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This loss is significantly higher than previously reported for silicon photonic devices due to our reliance on deposited polysilicon that has not been optimized for photonics. The top surface roughness of end-of-line polysilicon is approximately 6-8 nm rms with a correlation length of 100-200 nm as measured by TEM, which is consistent with theory [41]. Still, the measured Q is suitable for devices such as ringresonator WDM filters and modulators designed for 10 Gb/s datacom.…”
Section: Photonic Device Performance Analysissupporting
confidence: 85%
“…2) [13]. The coupling losses are about 8.5 dB that is one of the best values reported for this kind of waveguides.…”
Section: Linear Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The optical waveguides were patterned using 193-nm DUV lithography and two different inductively-coupled-plasma reactive-ion etching processes (ICP RIE): the first process, with an etch depth of 120 nm, was used to define the grating coupler and to lower the waveguides height from 220 nm to 100 nm, whereas the second, with a full-etch depth of 220 nm, was used to define the lateral edges of both standard and lowered-height strip waveguides. Propagation losses for the fabricated waveguides were measured to be 1.7-2 dB/cm for the 100 nm high waveguides and 2.8-3 dB/cm for the 220 nm high waveguides, thus proving that the use of reduced height waveguides can be profitable for propagation loss reduction [9,10]. The experimental set-up used for the dispersion measurements is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Chip Structure and Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The interest for this particular waveguides is due to the fact that they offer promising advantages with respect to the two main limitations occurring in standard waveguides: propagation losses and nonlinear losses [7,8]. Regarding the propagation losses it has already been reported in the literature that using reduced-height waveguides allows reducing the interaction of the optical mode with the waveguide sidewall roughness [9,10], and as a consequence many of the integrated structures requiring low-losses (e.g. filters) are realized using reduced-height waveguides [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%