The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2014.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three CdII complexes based on 2-(1H-imidazol-1-methyl)-1H-benzimidazole and homologous aliphatic dicarboxylates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dihedral angles between the mean planes defined the imidazole ring N1/N2/C2/C3/C5 and the coordinated and uncoordinated carboxylate groups are 2.0(2)° and 1.57(17)°, respectively, while the dihedral angles between the mean planes defined the imidazole ring N3/N4/C9/C11/C12 and the coordinated and uncoordinated carboxylate groups are 9.4(2)° and 1.61(18)°, respectively. The Cd–N bond lengths are 2.2781(13) and 2.2902(12) Å, while the Cd–O bond distances are in the range of 2.2992(11)–2.6023(11) Å, all of which are in the normal range of those observed in the reported Cd(II) complexes {[Cd(glu)(imb)]·H 2 O} n [imb = 2-(1H-imidazolyl-1-methyl)-1H-benzimidazole, H 2 glu = glutaric acid, Cd–N = 2.236(2)–2.325(2) Å, Cd–O = 2.212(2)–2.644(2) Å] 24 and [Cd 2 (cbimdaH) 2 (H 2 O) 6 ] n ·(DMF) 3 n ·(H 2 O) 3 n [cbimdaH 3 = 1-(4-carboxybenzyl)-1H-imidazole-4,5-dicarboxylic acid, Cd–N = 2.263(3)–2.294(3) Å, Cd–O = 2.252(4)–2.673(3) Å]. 25…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The dihedral angles between the mean planes defined the imidazole ring N1/N2/C2/C3/C5 and the coordinated and uncoordinated carboxylate groups are 2.0(2)° and 1.57(17)°, respectively, while the dihedral angles between the mean planes defined the imidazole ring N3/N4/C9/C11/C12 and the coordinated and uncoordinated carboxylate groups are 9.4(2)° and 1.61(18)°, respectively. The Cd–N bond lengths are 2.2781(13) and 2.2902(12) Å, while the Cd–O bond distances are in the range of 2.2992(11)–2.6023(11) Å, all of which are in the normal range of those observed in the reported Cd(II) complexes {[Cd(glu)(imb)]·H 2 O} n [imb = 2-(1H-imidazolyl-1-methyl)-1H-benzimidazole, H 2 glu = glutaric acid, Cd–N = 2.236(2)–2.325(2) Å, Cd–O = 2.212(2)–2.644(2) Å] 24 and [Cd 2 (cbimdaH) 2 (H 2 O) 6 ] n ·(DMF) 3 n ·(H 2 O) 3 n [cbimdaH 3 = 1-(4-carboxybenzyl)-1H-imidazole-4,5-dicarboxylic acid, Cd–N = 2.263(3)–2.294(3) Å, Cd–O = 2.252(4)–2.673(3) Å]. 25…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…7 Succinic acid has no contribution to the fluorescence emission of complex 1; similar cases have been reported. 18 In contrast to free immb, complex 1 shows a slightly red-shifted emission band caused by the metalligand coordination interactions which influence the rigidity and asymmetry of the ligands and the coordination environment of the metal centres. 19,20 In the case of complex 1, the decrease in fluorescence intensity may be due to the vibrational quenching by the presence of lattice water molecules.…”
Section: Fluorescence Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has permitted incorporation of high C-rates with impressive cycle life due to the enhanced stability of the composite anode [59,60]. With the advent of graphene, there has been an interest in SnO 2 -graphene composites with the hope that the high surface area and superior electrical conductivity of graphene could enhance the rate capability [61,62].…”
Section: Tinmentioning
confidence: 99%