The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation Versus Cervical Spine Thrust Manipulation in Patients With Acute Neck Pain : A Randomized Clinical Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
117
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
117
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…37 Few patients (3%) reported adverse effects after the cervical spine thrust manipulation, which is a lower percentage than that of a previous study 44 but similar to others. 37,38 This may be related to the restrictive inclusion criteria of the current study or the fact that we only included a short-term follow-up period for adverse effects, as it has been suggested that adverse events can occur up to 1 month after treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Few patients (3%) reported adverse effects after the cervical spine thrust manipulation, which is a lower percentage than that of a previous study 44 but similar to others. 37,38 This may be related to the restrictive inclusion criteria of the current study or the fact that we only included a short-term follow-up period for adverse effects, as it has been suggested that adverse events can occur up to 1 month after treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,25,42,52,60,64 The treating physical therapist documented the quantity of manual treatment performed on each body region. In this study, 1 "treatment" was operationally defined as 3 periods of 30 seconds of mobilization (grades I-IV) or 1 thrust manipulation.…”
Section: Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of both studies demonstrate that cervical and thoracic Thrust Manipulations were equally effective in reducing pain and improving disability and ROM in patients with neck pain, but one study states that in comparison with cervical manipulation, thoracic manipulation was more effective [45], while the other found cervical manipulation to be the superior intervention [27]. According to a recently published systematic review, TM and CM are both equally effective.…”
Section: Thoracic Manipulation: Multi Level Versus Single Levelmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Recent evidence supports using exercise for alleviating pain and improving dysfunction and disability [1,27,40,47]. In a recent clinical trial, eligible subjects with chronic neck pain were divided into either TM and Deep Craniocervical Flexor (DCF) training group, or craniocervical flexor training alone.…”
Section: Thoracic Manipulation Versus Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation