2012
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2012.4151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate Changes in Widespread Pressure Pain Sensitivity, Neck Pain, and Cervical Range of Motion After Cervical or Thoracic Thrust Manipulation in Patients With Bilateral Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
126
2
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
126
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have shown that interventions directed to the cervical spine exert a mechanical hypoalgesic effect by increasing PPT. 20,21,31 The increase in PPT over the hamate on the affected side immediately postintervention is consistent with the results of Moss et al, 33 who showed that joint mobilization of the tibia or the femur for 9 minutes in patients with knee OA had an immediate, local hypoalgesic effect. These techniques are frequently performed and are often included as an integral part of the rehabilitation program.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Numerous studies have shown that interventions directed to the cervical spine exert a mechanical hypoalgesic effect by increasing PPT. 20,21,31 The increase in PPT over the hamate on the affected side immediately postintervention is consistent with the results of Moss et al, 33 who showed that joint mobilization of the tibia or the femur for 9 minutes in patients with knee OA had an immediate, local hypoalgesic effect. These techniques are frequently performed and are often included as an integral part of the rehabilitation program.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In the current study, a single treatment session of TrPDN also led to statistically significant and likely clinically important increases in cervical range of motion (TA-BLE 4), with the mean differences in chang- es between groups being generally larger than those previously observed after cervical spine manipulation (ranging from 1.6° to 5.7°) 2,32 ; however, those previous studies included individuals with chronic neck pain. Changes in range of motion could be related to mechanical effects induced by TrPDN, for example, disruption of contraction knots (TrP), localized stretch of contracted cytoskeletal structures, and reduction of overlap between actin and myosin filaments.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…11,12,16,20,22,47 Previous trials examining the benefits of using thoracic spine thrust manipulation 11,12,16,22,30,31,57 have compared thoracic spine thrust manipulation to placebo manipulation, cervical thrust manipulation, and combinations of electrothermal modalities. To our knowledge, no previous studies have compared thoracic spine thrust manipulation to other forms of nonthrust manual therapy techniques directed at the cervical spine.…”
Section: T T Conclusion: Individuals With Neck Painmentioning
confidence: 99%