This statement is not true' is not true

Reference, paradoxes and truth

“…(Gaifman calls Z "the two lines puzzle". A similar, though informal, analysis of the Strengthened Liar can be found in Goldstein (1992).) Consider now the sentence y = "It is true that this sentence is false".…”

Liars, truthtellers, and naysayers: A broader view of semantic pathology I

“…10, where it is called ''under-determination''. Detailed consideration of the open pair's pathological nature is offered in Goldstein, 1992;Sorensen, 2001 andPriest, 2005;Woodbridge and Armour-Garb, 2005, Armour-Garb and Woodbridge, 2006 and2010a. 22 Although similar to Sorensen's (2001) 'no-no paradox' label for cases like (6)/(7), we prefer calling the general class of such cases naysayers and the paradigm case the open pair.…”

“…Given their symmetry, any reason for ascribing a particular truth-value to one of these sentences is equally reason for ascribing that same truth-value to the other. The open pair, on this view, seems to amount to a more complex form of the liar paradox, manifesting only inconsistency, and is to be dealt with the same way that other liars are, whatever way the theorist in questions thinks that is (Goldstein, 1992;Priest, 2005).…”

Truthmaker Gaps and the No‐No Paradox

“…51‐54). For discussion of the paradox see Goldstein (1992), Sorensen (2001, 2002, 2003, 2005a, 2005b), Armour‐Garb and Woodbridge (2005, 2006), and Priest (2005).…”