2017
DOI: 10.1080/1047840x.2017.1373556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thinking Structurally About Implicit Bias: Some Peril, Lots of Promise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More broadly, the present work supports recent arguments to examine sociostructural factors as potential determinants of both stability and fluctuation in implicit bias over time (Daumeyer et al., 2017; Payne & Vuletich, 2018; Payne et al., 2017). There have only been a handful of studies examining the role of sociostructural factors, such as contextual ethnic diversity (Devos & Sadler, 2019; Devos et al., 2019; Rae et al., 2015; Sadler & Devos, 2020), legalization of same‐sex marriage (Ofosu et al., 2019), and proportion of slaves in 1860 (Payne et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…More broadly, the present work supports recent arguments to examine sociostructural factors as potential determinants of both stability and fluctuation in implicit bias over time (Daumeyer et al., 2017; Payne & Vuletich, 2018; Payne et al., 2017). There have only been a handful of studies examining the role of sociostructural factors, such as contextual ethnic diversity (Devos & Sadler, 2019; Devos et al., 2019; Rae et al., 2015; Sadler & Devos, 2020), legalization of same‐sex marriage (Ofosu et al., 2019), and proportion of slaves in 1860 (Payne et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…There has been a recent revival of the idea that IAT is more useful as an measure of systematic bias, rather than as a measure of individual differences [6]. On this view, aggregate IAT measures may function as a "barometer of inequality" [7] which reflects a combination of social and structural factors alongside both stable and transient individual differences. Losing confidence in individual scores might have the salutary effect of focusing attention on the large, undeniable inequalities which remain a feature of contemporary society.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Far too many psychological studies of racial bias concern themselves solely with the intentions of individual actors, examining the extent to which bias is implicit versus explicit (Greenwald, Nosek, & Banaji, 2003) and whether people are or are not motivated to control or express prejudice (Devine, 1989; Plant & Devine, 1998). As social psychologists, we advocate for an understanding of race and racism in the context of the large and systemic structural and cultural forces that create and maintain racial patterns of inequality in economic, social, and health domains (Daumeyer, Rucker, & Richeson, 2017; Payne, Vuletich, & Lundberg, 2017; Richeson & Sommers, 2016; Salter, Adams, & Perez, 2018). Centering race in scholarship on economic inequality has the added benefit of focusing attention on the structural components of the psychology of racism, which will help scholars better articulate the ways in which the psychology of racial prejudice extends from individuals to institutions and back again.…”
Section: Societal Policy Change and Color-blind Approaches To Messagimentioning
confidence: 99%