Think Different: The Merits of Unconscious Thought in Preference Development and Decision Making.

Abstract

The role of unconscious and conscious thought in decision making was investigated in 5 experiments. Because of the low processing capacity of consciousness, conscious thought was hypothesized to be maladaptive when making complex decisions. Conversely, unconscious thought was expected to be highly effective. In Experiments 1-3, participants were presented with a complex decision problem in which they had to choose between various alternatives, each with multiple attributes. Some participants had to make a decision immediately after being presented with the options. In the conscious thought condition, participants could think about the decision for a few minutes. In the unconscious thought condition, participants were distracted for a few minutes and then indicated their decision. Throughout the experiments, unconscious thinkers made the best decisions. Additional evidence obtained in Experiments 4 and 5 suggests that unconscious thought leads to clearer, more polarized, and more integrated representations in memory.

How to Study Consciousness in Consumer Research, A Commentary on Williams and Poehlman

“…Furthermore, it would be downright extraordinary if the choices people make when not even thinking about the alternatives turn out to be superior compared to when they devote their full attentional and cognitive resources (Dijksterhuis 2004;Waroquier et al 2009). …”

Social status modulates prosocial behavior and egalitarianism in preschool children and adults

“…Subsequently, participants completed an unrelated task in which they read information about potential apartments and roommates and chose an apartment and a roommate. The roommates and apartments varied in number of positive and negative attributes, so that decisionmaking quality could be measured (40). Participants were then invited to move and sit together with other participants of the same style, introduce themselves to the group, and discuss their roommate preferences.…”

Ambicultural blending between Eastern and Western paradigms: Fresh perspectives for international management research

“…Western managers and researchers may receive valuable inspiration for dealing with the ever increasing complexity of global political, economic and social environments from the Asian embodied, holistic, intuitive way of thinking (Kainzbauer 2010) because a holistic, intuitive awareness of dynamic realities seems to have distinctive advantages in dealing with complex situations (Dijksterhuis 2004, Patton 2003. Eastern paradoxical dualism has already begun to be explored in strategy (Mintzberg 2001;Chen 2002), communication theory (Cheng 1987;Yuan 1997) and knowledge management (Chae and Bloodgood 2006).…”