2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.04.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thickness and composition dependence of the glass transition temperature in thin random copolymer films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
80
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…233,234 ) Depending upon the polymer and the substrate, T g can decrease or increase with decreasing film thickness, with increases of up to 40 K being reported. [237][238][239][240][241][242] T g decreases are generally interpreted in terms of enhanced mobility at the free surface while increases in T g are interpreted as reduced mobility near the substrate interface. Even bigger decreases in T g (up to 70 K) have been reported for freestanding polymer films in the nanometer regime.…”
Section: A Thin Film Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…233,234 ) Depending upon the polymer and the substrate, T g can decrease or increase with decreasing film thickness, with increases of up to 40 K being reported. [237][238][239][240][241][242] T g decreases are generally interpreted in terms of enhanced mobility at the free surface while increases in T g are interpreted as reduced mobility near the substrate interface. Even bigger decreases in T g (up to 70 K) have been reported for freestanding polymer films in the nanometer regime.…”
Section: A Thin Film Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymeric materials that experience confinement are influenced by the substrate composition, especially in films with thicknesses less than 100 nm. [55,56] In strongly interacting polymer/substrate systems such as Nafion/gold, the backbone lies parallel to the surface as a result of the sulfonate/substrate interactions driving the side chain to orient perpendicularly to the surface, for films with thicknesses of well beyond 25 nm, as evidenced by the negative birefringence values (n ≈ -0.01) for samples with thickness greater than 200 nm on platinum and gold.…”
Section: Molecular Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The T g of molecular liquids and polymers can deviate substantially from the bulk T g with confinement to the nanometre length-scale. 15,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36] As the confining dimension is decreased below a critical value, e.g., film thickness in polymer films, interparticle spacing in polymer nanocomposites, diameter in molecular glass-former filled controlled pore glass, an increasingly large fraction of material is in direct contact with interfaces. The deviation in T g with confinement can be explained as a result of (or lack of) interfacial interactions between the polymer and the interface.…”
Section: Confinement Effects On the Glass Transition Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%