2020
DOI: 10.1017/s0007123420000150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘They Take Our Houses’: Benefit Competition and the Erosion of Support for Immigrants' Social Rights

Abstract: Does benefit competition affect voters' support for immigrants' social rights? While scholars in political economy expect that benefit competition lowers support among the poor, the evidence is limited. This seems to be largely due to the reliance on highly aggregated analyses and the neglect of the institutional context in which individuals form their preferences. This article argues that lower-income voters are more likely to reduce their support due to competition when benefit eligibility depends on income.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A voluminous literature addresses the question of why voters support PRR parties. Much of this work has focused on the developments that have driven up “demand” for these parties, 2 ranging from rising immigration, to associated cultural and economic threats, to the pressures wrought by globalization (Europeanization) and austerity and accompanying shifts in groups’ social status and nationalist leanings (Dancygier, 2010; Gidron & Hall, 2017; Golder, 2016; Halikiopoulou et al, 2012; Hobolt & Tilley, 2016; Hooijer, forthcoming; Lancaster, 2020; Vasilopoulou, 2018).…”
Section: Voter Motivations and Party Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A voluminous literature addresses the question of why voters support PRR parties. Much of this work has focused on the developments that have driven up “demand” for these parties, 2 ranging from rising immigration, to associated cultural and economic threats, to the pressures wrought by globalization (Europeanization) and austerity and accompanying shifts in groups’ social status and nationalist leanings (Dancygier, 2010; Gidron & Hall, 2017; Golder, 2016; Halikiopoulou et al, 2012; Hobolt & Tilley, 2016; Hooijer, forthcoming; Lancaster, 2020; Vasilopoulou, 2018).…”
Section: Voter Motivations and Party Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research has focused on the disruptions caused by immigration, but aside from a few contributions (Anelli and Peri, 2017;Lim, 2022;Patana, 2021) it has neglected the consequences of emigration. Whereas immigration can bolster populist radical right parties through congestion effects and overburdened public services (Cremaschi et al, 2022;Dancygier, 2010;Hooijer, 2021), we show that opposite forces can do the same. The emptying out of regions can produce frustrations of equal importance, with significant political consequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In terms of pressure on housing, this is likely to be keenly felt in the immediate neighbourhood. Furthermore, this channel is recognised in the literature as a factor in the rise of anti-immigrant parties (e.g., Cavaille and Ferwerda 2018;Hooijer 2021). Work by Dancygier (2010) on West Indian and South Asian migration in Britain, including case studies of two London boroughs, highlights the role of competition for public housing as a trigger for conflict and providing fertile ground for far-right fascist parties in the second half of the previous century.…”
Section: Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%