2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7189(03)00028-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

They look good but don't work: a case study of global performance indicators in crime prevention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measures most often used to evaluate these programmes were residents' perceptions of safety and fear of crime, as well as police data. Van den Eynde and colleagues34 used global performance measures to evaluate a 3-year community crime prevention programme, but found that they were not able to attribute changes specifically to the crime-prevention programmes using such measures. A systematic review of Neighbourhood Watch programmes that used police crime data found conflicting evidence as to their effectiveness in reducing social disorder and crime 29…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measures most often used to evaluate these programmes were residents' perceptions of safety and fear of crime, as well as police data. Van den Eynde and colleagues34 used global performance measures to evaluate a 3-year community crime prevention programme, but found that they were not able to attribute changes specifically to the crime-prevention programmes using such measures. A systematic review of Neighbourhood Watch programmes that used police crime data found conflicting evidence as to their effectiveness in reducing social disorder and crime 29…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%