1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf03339244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thesen zur Theoriendiskussion in der Mathematikdidaktik

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The reflection on practices of theorizing in a research field can tell us more about theories, theorizing and their roles than a precise definition can. For doing so, Bigalke's (1984) notion of the 'core' of a theory is fruitful (see Maier & Beck, 2001, p. 31) by which he stresses an aspect of theories that Niss included implicitly in his definition and that Mason and Waywood included in the philosophical background of a theory. Starting from the view of theories as structured buildings of knowledge, Bigalke (1984) distinguishes the core of the theory (which comprises central aspects taken for granted) from the empirical component with features, aspects, claims and concepts extracted from or added to the core.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The reflection on practices of theorizing in a research field can tell us more about theories, theorizing and their roles than a precise definition can. For doing so, Bigalke's (1984) notion of the 'core' of a theory is fruitful (see Maier & Beck, 2001, p. 31) by which he stresses an aspect of theories that Niss included implicitly in his definition and that Mason and Waywood included in the philosophical background of a theory. Starting from the view of theories as structured buildings of knowledge, Bigalke (1984) distinguishes the core of the theory (which comprises central aspects taken for granted) from the empirical component with features, aspects, claims and concepts extracted from or added to the core.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since the development of any scientific discipline is deeply intertwined with its theoretical work, there was a need to clarify what kinds of theories were adequate for the discipline. This was done by Jahnke (1978) and Bigalke (1984), who proposed the Sneed and Stegmüller's concept a suitable theory concept for the field:…”
Section: Theory Traditions In German-speaking Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of theory was more explicitly discussed about 10 years later in two papers (Burscheid 1983;Bigalke 1984) and in two comments (Fischer 1983;Steiner 1983) published in the JMD. As an example of the discussion about theory at that time, we will convey the different positions in these papers in more detail.…”
Section: How To Understand Theories and How They Relatementioning
confidence: 99%