2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00397-006-0099-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermorheological properties near the glass transition of oligomeric poly(methyl methacrylate) blended with acrylic polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanocages

Abstract: Two distinct oligomeric species of similar mass and chemical functionality (M w ≈ 2,000 g/mol), one a linear methyl methacrylate oligomer (radius of gyration R g ≈ 1.1 nm) and the other a hybrid organic-inorganic polyhedral silsesquioxane nanocage (methacryl-POSS, r ≈ 1.0 nm), were subjected to thermal and rheological tests to compare the behaviors of these geometrically dissimilar molecules over the entire composition range. The glass transition temperatures of the blends varied monotonically between the glas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The "m fragility" 40 of m-cresol is reported as ~65 (D = 10) 41 , based on viscosity data. The m fragility of pure POSS AM270, according to the variable scan rate differential scanning calorimetry protocol developed by Velikov 42 and Wang 43 , is 76, which is comparable to the value of 74 reported by Kopesky et al for a methacrylate POSS 44 . The conductivities likewise show non-Arrhenius temperature dependences, though we do not consider these dependences here, beyond noting that, in the temperature range of interest, they are the same as for viscosity when no POSS is present.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The "m fragility" 40 of m-cresol is reported as ~65 (D = 10) 41 , based on viscosity data. The m fragility of pure POSS AM270, according to the variable scan rate differential scanning calorimetry protocol developed by Velikov 42 and Wang 43 , is 76, which is comparable to the value of 74 reported by Kopesky et al for a methacrylate POSS 44 . The conductivities likewise show non-Arrhenius temperature dependences, though we do not consider these dependences here, beyond noting that, in the temperature range of interest, they are the same as for viscosity when no POSS is present.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Octahedral POSS-amide-Py exhibited not only melting at around T m = 104 °C but also a glass transition (T g = 3 °C) ( Figure S5 ). It may be explained by adjustment of more flexible segments in the crystal structure, analogously to that observed in macromolecular systems [ 52 , 53 , 54 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Homopolymerized octa(methyl-methacrylate) POSS shows a glass transition at 191°C [65], much higher than the unpolymerized moiety as mentioned earlier in this paragraph [55,56] and presumably due to the restriction of dynamics by the bonds. An even higher T g ≈ 320°C has been reported for a a polymerized octabenzoxazine POSS moiety [66].…”
Section: [Figure 5]mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Blends of the unmodified acryl-substituted POSS of the previous study with an unentangled oligomeric MMA with M w = 2160 g/mol -comparable to that of the POSSwas the subject of another study of the same group [55]. The T g of the POSS moiety was A follow-up work [115] studied the toughenability of some of the materials studied in refs.…”
Section: Polyacrylatesmentioning
confidence: 98%