1973
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1101(73)90207-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic considerations of junction capacitance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the capacitance per unit device width C n-p between the n-type and p-type contacts of the forward-biased GT-SPED is rather high due to the charge carrier diffusion capacitance. 19 Using the distributions obtained in the numerical simulations of the electron and hole transport in the GT-SPED and the thermodynamic definition of capacitance 37 given by…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the capacitance per unit device width C n-p between the n-type and p-type contacts of the forward-biased GT-SPED is rather high due to the charge carrier diffusion capacitance. 19 Using the distributions obtained in the numerical simulations of the electron and hole transport in the GT-SPED and the thermodynamic definition of capacitance 37 given by…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the capacitance per unit device width C n‑p between the n-type and p-type contacts of the forward-biased GT-SPED is rather high due to the charge carrier diffusion capacitance . Using the distributions obtained in the numerical simulations of the electron and hole transport in the GT-SPED and the thermodynamic definition of capacitance given by where V is either the gate or bias voltage, E ( x , y , V ), n ( x , y , V ), and p ( x , y , V ) are the electric field, electron density, and hole density distributions, and n i is the intrinsic electron density in 4H-SiC, we estimate C p‑n to be 3 nF/cm at V bias = 2.77 V ( J = 30 A/cm 2 ). The resistance in the transient process can be estimated from the current–voltage characteristics V bias ( I ) as R p‑n = d V bias /d I = 10 Ωcm, which gives a characteristic time of R p‑n C p‑n = 30 ns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…How can the seemingly conflicting answers [17,18] to these claims be resolved? 3. A method has been suggested for theoretically testing the validity of the Schottky equations [15,16] What are the proper definitions [19,20,21] [23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Capacitance-voltage Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%