2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic comparison of direct supercritical CO2 and indirect brine-ORC concepts for geothermal combined heat and power generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed critically in Ref. [23], the evaluation of geothermal CHP concepts typically requires a consideration of part-load behaviour, as well as a focus of the annual achievable net power, since the heating demand of a DHS varies strongly over a year. Although Gabrielle's model [31] provides a part-load model as a function of the working fluid's density, the work by Dawo et al [32] indicates that this model may provide overly optimistic results for use with large-scale turbines in geothermal applications.…”
Section: Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As discussed critically in Ref. [23], the evaluation of geothermal CHP concepts typically requires a consideration of part-load behaviour, as well as a focus of the annual achievable net power, since the heating demand of a DHS varies strongly over a year. Although Gabrielle's model [31] provides a part-load model as a function of the working fluid's density, the work by Dawo et al [32] indicates that this model may provide overly optimistic results for use with large-scale turbines in geothermal applications.…”
Section: Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The further model parameters are taken from Refs. [12,21,23,24]. Table 1 summarises the main model parameters.…”
Section: System Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In theoretical analysis, the isentropic efficiency usually takes a fixed value that has not been verified by experiments. Table 1 briefly lists the selection of the isentropic efficiency of the pump (Mohammadzadeh Bina et al, 2017;Mateu-Royo et al, 2019;Shen et al, 2019;Wang and Fu, 2019;Altun and Kilic, 2020;Morais et al, 2020;Schifflechner et al, 2020;Jafary et al, 2021;Khoshgoftar Manesh et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2021). The experimental test showed that the diaphragm pump efficiency was 32% (Kosmadakis et al, 2016); the efficiency of the vane pump was 36.9% (Kim et al, 2017); the plunger pump efficiency was 33.6% (Chang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the current research on pumps is generally carried out on the test bench of the ORC system (Feng et al, 2019). Because the experimental test of the ORC system is generally carried out under a stable high- Wang et al (2021) 2021 Design and optimization of the ORC for marine engine waste heat recovery 80 Morais et al (2020) 2020 Economic, energetic, and exergetic analyses of a solar-biomass-ORC cooling cogeneration hybrid system 85 Altun and Kilic (2020) 2020 Thermodynamic evaluation of the ORC for geothermal power 80 Schifflechner et al (2020) 2020 Thermodynamic comparison of the supercritical CO 2 and ORC for geothermal combined heat and power generation 80 Wang and Fu (2019) 2019 Thermoeconomic analysis of the CCHP-ORC system 80 Shen et al (2019) 2019 Design and optimization of the ORC system 100 Mateu-Royo et al (2019) 2019 Multi-objective optimization of a high-temperature heat pump-ORC hybrid system 90 Mohammadzadeh Bina et al (2017) 2017 Thermoeconomic evaluation of the ORC for geothermal power 95…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%