2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.03.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic assessment of the LiF–ThF4–PuF3–UF4 system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculation according to eq 1 (using interval estimation) gives 172.50 and 138 J mol −1 K −1 for the molar heat capacities of tetra-and trihalides, respectively. The experimental values 21,22 for thorium, plutonium, and uranium halides and their deviation from the calculated values are given in Table 3. The differences are within the experimental error.…”
Section: ■ Heat Capacity Of Molten Halide Saltsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation according to eq 1 (using interval estimation) gives 172.50 and 138 J mol −1 K −1 for the molar heat capacities of tetra-and trihalides, respectively. The experimental values 21,22 for thorium, plutonium, and uranium halides and their deviation from the calculated values are given in Table 3. The differences are within the experimental error.…”
Section: ■ Heat Capacity Of Molten Halide Saltsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work presents new measurements for PuF 3 and for the mixture LiF-ThF 4 -UF 4 -PuF 3 (77.5e6.6-12.3e3.6 mol%), selected as a possible fuel composition for the MSFR. Because no experimental data was available in literature for this mixture, results were discussed comparing calculated values obtained using the thermodynamic database assessed by Capelli et al [36]. In general, calculations predicted quite well experimental values, but some significant deviations (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Given uncertainties are based on the experience and the literature [35], which suggests to use a larger error for the liquidus point as the signal is less clear. Both transitions were calculated using the thermodynamic database assessed by Capelli et al [36] in combination with the FactSage thermodynamic software [37]. A visual representation of the calculations is given in Fig.…”
Section: Phase Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations