1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00657401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermally induced crystallization in glassy syndiotactic polystyrene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
39
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results shown in Figures 6 and 7 are in agreement with previous studies 20,31,41 which showed that on annealing sPS in the range 120-220°C, the planar mesophase is nucleated first, which then converts into the poorly ordered R′ form. The extent of conversion depends on the annealing temperature and time.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results shown in Figures 6 and 7 are in agreement with previous studies 20,31,41 which showed that on annealing sPS in the range 120-220°C, the planar mesophase is nucleated first, which then converts into the poorly ordered R′ form. The extent of conversion depends on the annealing temperature and time.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…At 130°C, a temperature within the cold crystallization region of amorphous sPS, the diffraction pattern is that of the planar mesomorphic phase with T 4 conformation. 14,20,31 At 175 and 210°C, the pattern is essentially that of the mesophase with a hint of the evolution of the R phase. The R phase, however, is fully formed at 240°C; the crystals obtained under such conditions generally show broad reflections and have a low degree of perfection, and the crystalline phase is termed R′.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, a WAXD study near the melting region of about 270°C showed that the double endothermic melting behavior of sPS was caused not by a change in the crystalline form but by a recrystallization to a more perfect crystal [48]. The normalized crystallinity of sPS in the composites, X c , is given by the Equation (1): (1) where ΔH f is the melting enthalpy of sPS in the composites, ΔH f 0 is the melting enthalpy of 100% crystalline sPS (ΔH f 0 = 53 J/g) [49] and w is the weight fraction of sPS in the composites. A variation in the X c value depending on the nanotube contents was observed for the composites, i. e., for the sPS/SWNT-PS composites, the X c value increased drastically with the addition of a small amount of SWNT-PS (ca.…”
Section: Thermal Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Additionally, two mesomorphic phases have been observed, with a helical conformation 20,21 and with a zigzag conformation. 22,23 Guerra et al 3 showed that its complex polymorphism depends on a combination of concurrent factors, such as the cooling rate, the parent's previous initial crystalline form before melting, the maximum temperature (T max ), and the residence time in the molten state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%