Thermal Stability of Various Cathode Materials against Li&lt;sub&gt;6.25&lt;/sub&gt;Al&lt;sub&gt;0.25&lt;/sub&gt;La&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;Zr&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;12&lt;/sub&gt; Electrolyte

Wakasugi, Jungo; Munakata, Hirokazu; Kanamura, Kiyoshi

doi:10.5796/electrochemistry.85.77

Cited by 39 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…364−366 While hightemperature sintering can densify pellets, it can also cause unwanted reactions between the cathode and SE, resulting in high interfacial resistance and poor cell performance. 367,368 The addition of an ionic-conductive low-melting-temperature binder such as Li 3 BO 3 has been shown to improve the cathode/SE contact and reduce the interfacial resistance. 369 Similarly, polymers such as poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) have been used to improve the interfacial contact in oxide-SE-based composite cathodes.…”

Section: Composite Electrode Morphologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Promises and Challenges of Next-Generation “Beyond Li-ion” Batteries for Electric Vehicles and Grid Decarbonization

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The tremendous improvement in performance and cost of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have made them the technology of choice for electrical energy storage. While established battery chemistries and cell architectures for Li-ion batteries achieve good power and energy density, LIBs are unlikely to meet all the performance, cost, and scaling targets required for energy storage, in particular, in large-scale applications such as electrified transportation and grids. The demand to further reduce cost and/or increase energy density, as well as the growing concern related to natural resource needs for Li-ion have accelerated the investigation of so-called "beyond Li-ion" technologies. In this review, we will discuss the recent achievements, challenges, and opportunities of four important "beyond Li-ion" technologies: Na-ion batteries, K-ion batteries, all-solid-state batteries, and multivalent batteries. The fundamental science behind the challenges, and potential solutions toward the goals of a low-cost and/or high-energy-density future, are discussed in detail for each technology. While it is unlikely that any given new technology will fully replace Li-ion in the near future, "beyond Li-ion" technologies should be thought of as opportunities for energy storage to grow into mid/large-scale applications.

show abstract

Section: Composite Electrode Morphologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Promises and Challenges of Next-Generation “Beyond Li-ion” Batteries for Electric Vehicles and Grid Decarbonization

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…37 Furthermore, this approach would be exclusive to these phases and would not apply for many other oxide cathodes because of their higher reactivity with LLZO. 38 For instance, a pellet-based compatibility study 39 40,41 Sintering additives can be used to facilitate the particle interconnection and densification of the cathode and electrolyte interface at reduced processing temperature, as shown in Fig. 1a(ii).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

All ceramic cathode composite design and manufacturing towards low interfacial resistance for garnet-based solid-state lithium batteries

Choi

Rupp

2020

Energy Environ. Sci.

126

118

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It has been shown that a number of Table I. decomposition materials such as La 2 Zr 2 O 7 , La 2 O 3 , La 3 TaO 7 , TiO 2 , and LaMnO 3 form and are detrimental to interfacial impedance after fabrication. 146,150 Lower temperature densification and processing steps could be a valuable method to mitigate these effects. 187 Broadly speaking, with the exception of thin film cathodes all reports of full cell architectures utilize lower active material electrode loading than state-of-the-art liquid cells.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Review—Practical Challenges Hindering the Development of Solid State Li Ion Batteries

Kerman

Luntz

Viswanathan

et al. 2017

J. Electrochem. Soc.

586

471

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Solid state electrolyte systems boasting Li + conductivity of >10 mS cm −1 at room temperature have opened the potential for developing a solid state battery with power and energy densities that are competitive with conventional liquid electrolyte systems. The primary focus of this review is twofold. First, differences in Li penetration resistance in solid state systems are discussed, and kinetic limitations of the solid state interface are highlighted. Second, technological challenges associated with processing such systems in relevant form factors are elucidated, and architectures needed for cell level devices in the context of product development are reviewed. Specific research vectors that provide high value to advancing solid state batteries are outlined and discussed. Solid state battery systems are of great interest because of potential benefits in gravimetric and volumetric energy density, operable temperature range, and safety in comparison to traditional liquid electrolyte based systems. However, unresolved fundamental issues remain in the quest to fully understand the behavior of all-solid batteries, especially in the area of electrochemical interfaces.1 There are also a number of significant engineering challenges that require methodical effort to enable a tangible product. Some transitions from academic laboratories to entrepreneurial efforts attempting to overcome these challenges remain unsuccessful in efforts to bring a product to the market.2,3 Vital parameters that require robust understanding from a product development standpoint are material cost, cell lifetime and shelf life, cell energy density on a volumetric and gravimetric basis, operable capabilities for given temperature conditions, and safety. The advantage of energy density remains to be realized in solid state electrolytes (SSEs) since most studies to date utilize thick SSEs or cathodes with low active loading compared to liquid counterparts. 4,5 Furthermore, the desire to use SSEs in conjunction with Li metal anodes requires understanding and managing the morphology of Li metal plating, which can impact volumetric energy density. Operation at both higher and lower temperature compared to conventional technologies is a significant potential advantage of SSE systems. However, reports of solid state cells achieving parity with traditional systems at room temperature or any other temperature do not currently exist. The safety, specifically decreased flammability, of SSE systems is another potential advantage but requires ongoing validation and study.6 Unlike current liquid electrolyte systems, 7 the manufacturability and material component costs of SSEs have not been well characterized, and thus the value of these features will need to be weighed accordingly with any added cost. Operating lifetime of SSEs capturing intrinsic materials parameters such as voltage stability, 8 as well as catastrophic failure modes such as shorting, 9 have been briefly investigated, but in the absence of high energy density electrode formulations and appli...

show abstract

Thermal Stability of Various Cathode Materials against Li<sub>6.25</sub>Al<sub>0.25</sub>La<sub>3</sub>Zr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>12</sub> Electrolyte

Cited by 39 publications

References 22 publications

Promises and Challenges of Next-Generation “Beyond Li-ion” Batteries for Electric Vehicles and Grid Decarbonization

Promises and Challenges of Next-Generation “Beyond Li-ion” Batteries for Electric Vehicles and Grid Decarbonization

All ceramic cathode composite design and manufacturing towards low interfacial resistance for garnet-based solid-state lithium batteries

Review—Practical Challenges Hindering the Development of Solid State Li Ion Batteries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About