2017
DOI: 10.1177/1077546317695464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal morphing anisogrid smart space structures part 2: Ranking of geometric parameter importance, trust region optimization, and performance evaluation

Abstract: As future space mission structures are required to achieve more with scarcer resources, new structural configurations and modeling capabilities will be needed to meet the next generation space structural challenges. A paradigm shift is required away from the current structures that are static, heavy, and stiff, to innovative lightweight structures that meet requirements by intelligently adapting to the environment. As the complexity of these intelligent structures increases, the computational cost of the model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodology developed in this paper has been shown, via examples, to be computationally efficient in identifying and ranking the important parameters in complex correlation efforts (Phoenix et al., 2016). The approach was shown to remove low-impact and redundant parameters to generate an efficient reduced set for optimization (Phoenix et al., 2017). This methodology has also been demonstrated on the selection of optimal control points to minimize control complexity for a morphing surface (Phoenix et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methodology developed in this paper has been shown, via examples, to be computationally efficient in identifying and ranking the important parameters in complex correlation efforts (Phoenix et al., 2016). The approach was shown to remove low-impact and redundant parameters to generate an efficient reduced set for optimization (Phoenix et al., 2017). This methodology has also been demonstrated on the selection of optimal control points to minimize control complexity for a morphing surface (Phoenix et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach was shown to remove low-impact and redundant parameters to generate an efficient reduced set for optimization (Phoenix et al., 2017). This methodology has also been demonstrated on the selection of optimal control points to minimize control complexity for a morphing surface (Phoenix et al., 2017). In these previous efforts, the benefit of this methodology have been demonstrated in examples, but not fully developed, explained or vetted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%