1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0955-2219(98)00159-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal fatigue resistance of open cell ceramic foams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5, the data still fall on the same curve as those for 14 % dense material. This is in agreement with Vedula et al [7][8][9], who stated that thermal shock resistance of ceramic foam is not a strong function of density. The projected strength of the higher density YZA at 10 000 cycles is over 700 kPa.…”
Section: Longer Lifesupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5, the data still fall on the same curve as those for 14 % dense material. This is in agreement with Vedula et al [7][8][9], who stated that thermal shock resistance of ceramic foam is not a strong function of density. The projected strength of the higher density YZA at 10 000 cycles is over 700 kPa.…”
Section: Longer Lifesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The struts themselves are much smaller and weaker as a result, and cannot hold up to the stresses generated in the grinding process, so they tend to break instead of being polished. In addition, the thermal shock resis- tance of the foam is reduced as the pore size is decreased, as shown by Vedula et al [7][8][9], and this is an undesirable characteristic. For these cases, experimental reticulated kiln furniture is being tested.…”
Section: Foam Replication Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of interesting observations were made during the research works aiming at investigating the thermal shock resistance. The thermal shock resistance analysis of ceramic media was mainly focused on the measuring and calculating of Young's modulus and retained strength after thermal shock (Dimitrijevic, Posarac, Majstorovic, Volkov-Husovic, & Matovic, 2009;Ding, Zeng, & Jiang, 2006;Kan, Wei, Meng, & Xu, 2009;Orenstein & Green, 1992;Rendtorff, Garrido, & Aglietti, 2011;Vedula, Green, & Hellman, 1998;You et al, 2005), the length of crack growth (Panda, Kannan, Dubois, Olagnon, & Fantozzi, 2002;Yuan, 2008), and thermal stress resistance parameter (R 0 f ) (Vedula, Green, & Hellman, 1999). It is essential to establish theoretical models for the evaluation of thermal shock resistance behavior of these advanced materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore it is of interest to evaluate the behavior of a certain material after several thermal shock treatments. Thermal fatigue resistance (TFR) evaluation [19][20][21][22][23][24] consists in the measurement of a certain characteristic property of a material with successive thermal shock treatments. Both the experimental evidence and the theoretical models show certain saturation behavior for the TFR of ceramic materials.…”
Section: Thermal Fatigue Testmentioning
confidence: 99%