2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3245315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal contact resistance between graphene and silicon dioxide

Abstract: The thermal contact resistance between graphene and silicon dioxide was measured using a differential 3ω method. The sample thicknesses were 1.2 (single-layer graphene), 1.5, 2.8, and 3.0 nm, as determined by atomic force microscopy. All samples exhibited approximately the same temperature trend from 42 to 310 K, with no clear thickness dependence. The contact resistance at room temperature ranges from 5.6×10−9 to 1.2×10−8 m2 K/W, which is significantly lower than previous measurements involving related carbon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

41
289
4
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(337 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
41
289
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a 10 µm hemisphere for the model particle, the contact conductance is estimated at 46 kWm −2 K −1 . This value initially seems high in comparison to metal-metal contacts which have a conductance on the order of a few kWm −2 K −1 [9], however the contact conductance of graphene and highly ordered graphite can easily be tens of MWm −2 K −1 [10]. The loose bonding of the graphite with the surface of the optic and the agglomerated nature of the graphite flakes may explain the lower value calculated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Using a 10 µm hemisphere for the model particle, the contact conductance is estimated at 46 kWm −2 K −1 . This value initially seems high in comparison to metal-metal contacts which have a conductance on the order of a few kWm −2 K −1 [9], however the contact conductance of graphene and highly ordered graphite can easily be tens of MWm −2 K −1 [10]. The loose bonding of the graphite with the surface of the optic and the agglomerated nature of the graphite flakes may explain the lower value calculated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…15 We thus approximate g RIP  0.02 W m -1 K -1 for heat transfer by RIP scattering in the experiments of Baloch et al 11 To compare these CNT results with our VMTR measurements on graphene interfaces, we 12,13,27 and ~0.004 W m -1 K -1 for the multi-wall CNT interfaces. 15 There are two possible explanations for the different behaviour in graphene and CNTs.…”
Section: Textmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…where k ox = 1.4 Wm -1 K -1 is the thermal conductivity of SiO 2 , R Cox is the thermal resistance of the graphene-SiO 2 interface [40][41][42] , W eff ≈ W + 2t ox is the effective width of the heated region at the SiO 2 /Si interface, and k Si ~ 100 Wm -1 K -1 is the thermal conductivity of the doped Si substrate. We note eq.…”
Section: Previous Studies Have Characterized Individualmentioning
confidence: 99%