2018
DOI: 10.1039/c7nr07522g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal conductivity of suspended few-layer MoS2

Abstract: Modifying phonon thermal conductivity in nanomaterials is important not only for fundamental research but also for practical applications. However, the experiments on tailoring thermal conductivity in nanoscale, especially in two-dimensional materials, are rare due to technical challenges. In this work, we demonstrate the in situ thermal conduction measurement of MoS and find that its thermal conductivity can be continuously tuned to a required value from crystalline to amorphous limits. The reduction of therm… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This part was not included in the SW potentials. From here on, we only use the REBO-LJ potential and the efficient HNEMD method, focusing on comparisons with experiments [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and results from BTE approach combined with DFT calculations [19,20].…”
Section: Comparison Among the Empirical Potentials And With Experimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This part was not included in the SW potentials. From here on, we only use the REBO-LJ potential and the efficient HNEMD method, focusing on comparisons with experiments [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and results from BTE approach combined with DFT calculations [19,20].…”
Section: Comparison Among the Empirical Potentials And With Experimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal conductivity as a function of the number of layers for MoS2 at 300 K and zero pressure. Sources of reference data: Liu [9]; Zhu [10]; Jiang [11]; Sahoo [12]; Jo [13]; Yan [14]; Zhang [15]; Bae [16]; Yarali [17]; Aiyiti [18]; Gu [20].…”
Section: Comparison Among the Empirical Potentials And With Experimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal contact resistance could not be directly measured in experiment, which is a significant issue that restricts the thermal bridge method . The R c can be expressed as: R tot = R s + R c , where R s = L / tWκ ; t , W , κ and L are the thickness, width, thermal conductivity and length of suspended samples, respectively . It is a common sense that the thermal conductivity of samples is independent with its length and width when the length and width of samples is larger than its phonon mean free path.…”
Section: The Length Width Thermal Conductivity Seebeck Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To keep pace with the demand of continuous miniaturization of thermoelectric devices, recently much attention has been devoted to the development of 2D high‐efficiency TE materials with controllable thickness. [ 5–7 ] In general, the TE efficiency is characterized by the dimensionless figure of merit ZT = S 2 σT /(κ L + κ e ), where S , σ, T , κ L , and κ e are Seebeck coefficient, electrical conductivity, absolute temperature, lattice thermal conductivity and electronic thermal conductivity, respectively. Apparently, the high TE efficiency can be achieved by increasing the power factor (PF = S 2 σ) together with suppressing the sum of thermal conductivity (κ L + κ e ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%