2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3562610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal conductivity of chalcogenide material with superlatticelike structure

Abstract: Thermal conductivity of chalcogenide material with superlatticelike (SLL) structure is investigated using the 3ω method and the molecular dynamics method. Both the measured and calculated results show that the thermal conductivity of SLL is lower than those of conventional chalcogenide materials and will decrease to a minimum as the number of interfaces increases. The Raman spectrum is introduced to study the phonon behavior of SLL and the “phonon mode vanishing” is proposed to explain its lower thermal conduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 12-layered SLL device was found to have the lowest RESET current. Several explanations such as decreased thermal conductivity due to layering 10 and reduction of entropy losses 9 have been proposed for the current reduction exhibited in multi-layered PCRAM devices. This debate is ongoing and is not the focus of this work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 12-layered SLL device was found to have the lowest RESET current. Several explanations such as decreased thermal conductivity due to layering 10 and reduction of entropy losses 9 have been proposed for the current reduction exhibited in multi-layered PCRAM devices. This debate is ongoing and is not the focus of this work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These SLL PCRAM cells demonstrated lower RESET currents with faster write/erase speeds compared to conventional GST PCRAM cells, and the improvements have fueled a growing interest in understanding and improving the SLL structure. 9,10 Despite SLL structures displaying reduced currents, SLL structures are expected to have poorer endurance/reliability since phase change materials with different material properties (such as stoichiometric composition and lattice constants) are used to create the SLL. SLL layers with different stoichiometry could drive inter-layer diffusion while the different lattice constants will increase crystallization-induced stress thus impacting the reliability of SLL PCRAMs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation of the SLL layer thickness is known to have a strong correlation with the thermal conductivity of the SLL structure [8,9]. To study the size effects of the SLL dielectric, the rise in PT as a function of its thermal conductivity was investigated, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, most superlattice materials with a higher number of interfaces (generated either by increasing the number of layers or reducing the thickness of each layer in a SLL material with a given thickness) have lower thermal conductivities [8,9]. Considering the low thermal conductivities achieved in superlattice structures [8][9][10], the SLL dielectric was modeled as a single material layer, and assumed to have a thermal conductivity that is 50 % of that of the SiO 2 dielectric. We have also varied the thermal conductivity of the SLL dielectric to study the general effect of the SLL dielectric on the thermal properties of the PCRAM cell regardless of the layer numbers and thickness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimentally the phenomenon has been demonstrated, e.g., by Hicks et al in the PbTe/(Pb,Eu)Te system and by Ohta et al in the SrTiO 3 /Sr(Ti,Nb)O 3 system. Layered structures that show reduced thermal conductivity have been reported for a number of other material systems as well, such as CaTiO 3 /SrTiO 3 , W/Al 2 O 3 , PbTe/PbSe, IrSb 3 /CoSb 3 , AlN/GaN, TiNiSn/HfNiSn, Si/Ge (including alloy variants), GaAs/AlAs (including alloy variants), Bi 2 Te 3 /Sb 2 Te 3 , InAs/AlSb, InGaAs/InGaAsP, and Ge 2 Te 3 /Sb 2 Te 3 , to name a few. Most such inorganic–inorganic interfaces utilize isoelectronic substitution to retain the electrical conductivity and the high degree of crystallinity of the samples, which essentially grow epitaxially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%