1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00522151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal conductivity and diffusivity of biomaterials measured with self-heated thermistors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
196
2
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 284 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
13
196
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…S5A). The ventricular wall of the rabbit heart has a nominal thickness h = 1.9 mm, thermal conductivity k = 0.512 W/m/K (44), and a thermal diffusivity α = 0.131 mm 2 /s (45). Computed variations in surface temperature are consistent with experimental findings over the entire time range (∼3 min) without parameter fitting (SI Appendix, Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…S5A). The ventricular wall of the rabbit heart has a nominal thickness h = 1.9 mm, thermal conductivity k = 0.512 W/m/K (44), and a thermal diffusivity α = 0.131 mm 2 /s (45). Computed variations in surface temperature are consistent with experimental findings over the entire time range (∼3 min) without parameter fitting (SI Appendix, Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…We used the material properties required for solving the bioheat [ (1)] from the literature [9], [14], [15]. Table I summarizes the material properties included in our FEM models.…”
Section: B Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water predominates as a major determinant of the thermal properties of most soft tissues but its influence may be less important in hard tissues such as bone and dental enamel. Also, fatty tissues such as subcutaneous tissue and fatty atheromatous plaques have significantly different thermal properties than water dominated tissues (Valvano, 1985).…”
Section: Laser and Tissue Parameters: General Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%