2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.12.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal blob convection in spherical shells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When validated with numerical and experimental results of the concentric configuration, results suggested a power law correlation of the average N u number on the spherical boundaries with the Ra number and the aspect ratio, see equation (11), close to what has been proposed in previous work (see [15,16,6]). When simulating eccentric configurations, result suggested a transition from a conductive regime to a steady convective regime similar to that found in the concentric case.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…When validated with numerical and experimental results of the concentric configuration, results suggested a power law correlation of the average N u number on the spherical boundaries with the Ra number and the aspect ratio, see equation (11), close to what has been proposed in previous work (see [15,16,6]). When simulating eccentric configurations, result suggested a transition from a conductive regime to a steady convective regime similar to that found in the concentric case.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In Futterer et al (2012) we present test cases of the Earth laboratory set-up, where the fluid-filled spherical shell is regarded as a heated inner sphere and cooled outer sphere corresponding to the fluid physics of natural convection in spherical enclosures (Futterer et al 2007;Scurtu, Futterer & Egbers 2010).…”
Section: Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a discrepancy between experimentally and numerically detected stability threshholds is found for a Pr = 100 fluid, which is discussed in more detail in [21].…”
Section: Primary Flowmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Experimental studies with silicon oils as working fluids, and thus higher Prandtl numbers than water or air [3,32,37], were first performed by Egbers [19] and Böhm et al [5,6] starting with small radius ratios. Using a large diameter experimental cell (r 2 = 120 mm, η = 0.5, Pr = 100) Brucks was able to observe a third instability, the simultaneous existence of long stretched cells within the thermal boundary layer at the outer sphere and the time-dependent plumes descending from the cold inner sphere in distinct pulses [9,10,21]. Douglass et al [18] performed the first numerical linear stability analysis for radius ratios in the range of 0.35 ≤ η ≤ 0.95 and fluids corresponding with Prandtl numbers from Pr = 0 (idealisation of instantaneous communication of thermal perturbations throughout the fluid) to Pr = 100 [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%