2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘There is nothing paranormal about near-death experiences’ revisited: comment on Mobbs and Watt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Mobs & Watt, 2011). However, it has been pointed out by Greyson and colleagues that this article only accounted for those features that could be explained by the authors, while ignoring other features that are regarded as the most defining for NDEs (Greyson, Holden, & van Lommel, 2012). Furthermore, these alternative models must also be understood as speculative, given the lack of experiments performed at time of reported near death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…(Mobs & Watt, 2011). However, it has been pointed out by Greyson and colleagues that this article only accounted for those features that could be explained by the authors, while ignoring other features that are regarded as the most defining for NDEs (Greyson, Holden, & van Lommel, 2012). Furthermore, these alternative models must also be understood as speculative, given the lack of experiments performed at time of reported near death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These near-death experiences (NDE) (8), reported worldwide across cultures (9), are described to be highly lucid and vivid, and are perceived to be "realer than real" (10). Whether and how the brain is capable of generating conscious activity during cardiac arrest has been vigorously debated (11)(12)(13). We reasoned that if NDE stems from brain activity, neural correlates of consciousness should be identifiable in humans or animals after cessation of cerebral blood flow.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these multifactorial models, in an effort to be comprehensive, invoke untestable speculations regarding unspecified chemicals, and in order to explain "all" features of NDEs they ignore key features of the experience that they do not explain, such as accurate out-of-body perceptions [62,97], a problem that one of these authors acknowledged in a broadcast interview [98].…”
Section: Physiological Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%