“…Put differently, what might spatial perspectives make possible in terms of enriching and deepening understandings of belonging that might otherwise be elusive? In our view, the spatial perspectives of the theorists we have drawn upon for this article have much to offer, in part because of their resonance with contemporary understandings of early years settings as complex, relational and dynamic sites in which belonging, in turn, must be understood as a complex, relational and dynamic phenomenon (see, for e.g., Juutinen, Puroila & Johansson, 2018;Kustatscher, 2017;Stratigos, 2015a;Sumsion & Wong, 2011). But they also extend existing understandings, for instance, by demanding attention to the relational and the granular materiality of ECEC and related settings in ways that, with notable exceptions (e.g., Millei & Cliff, 2014;Stratigos, 2015b), are arguably not yet common in the ECEC literature -especially in relation to infants.…”