2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-75559-5_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“There Is No Room for You!” The Politics of Belonging in Children’s Play Situations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
10

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, touch as an invitation begins by Minea directly rejecting Elviira’s touch and pushing her away. In earlier research, pushing away has been discussed as children’s one way of excluding some children from play (Juutinen et al, 2018). However, in this small story, pushing away appears as a meaningful part of how the children’s relation develops.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Here, touch as an invitation begins by Minea directly rejecting Elviira’s touch and pushing her away. In earlier research, pushing away has been discussed as children’s one way of excluding some children from play (Juutinen et al, 2018). However, in this small story, pushing away appears as a meaningful part of how the children’s relation develops.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous research on children’s peer relations, touch has been in a marginal role (e.g. Corsaro, 2003; Hännikäinen, 2015; Juutinen et al, 2018). This article deepens theoretical understanding about touch in children’s peer relations: it shows touch as a multifaceted phenomenon and that the narrative environments of the preschools influence on touch in children’s relations.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Put differently, what might spatial perspectives make possible in terms of enriching and deepening understandings of belonging that might otherwise be elusive? In our view, the spatial perspectives of the theorists we have drawn upon for this article have much to offer, in part because of their resonance with contemporary understandings of early years settings as complex, relational and dynamic sites in which belonging, in turn, must be understood as a complex, relational and dynamic phenomenon (see, for e.g., Juutinen, Puroila & Johansson, 2018;Kustatscher, 2017;Stratigos, 2015a;Sumsion & Wong, 2011). But they also extend existing understandings, for instance, by demanding attention to the relational and the granular materiality of ECEC and related settings in ways that, with notable exceptions (e.g., Millei & Cliff, 2014;Stratigos, 2015b), are arguably not yet common in the ECEC literature -especially in relation to infants.…”
Section: Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%