1990
DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(90)90105-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of two-phase detonation—Part II: Structure

Abstract: The structure of a two-phase steady detonation in a granulated solid propellant is studied, and existence conditions for a one-dimensional, steady two-phase detonation are given. Ordinary differential equations from continuum mixture theory are solved numerically to determine steady wave structure. In the limiting case where heat transfer and compaction effects are negligible, the model reduces to two ordinary differential equations that have a clear geometrical interpretation in a two-dimensional phase plane.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together with Ref. [21], which gives predictions of the evolution of the steady CJ detonation structure identified by Powers et al [45], this work gives the only known detailed comparison between unsteady numerical predictions and steady-state results for two-phase detonation wave structure. Further, these comparisons conclusively show that all relevant detonation length scales are fully resolved, in contrast to most published work in this area, which is underresolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Together with Ref. [21], which gives predictions of the evolution of the steady CJ detonation structure identified by Powers et al [45], this work gives the only known detailed comparison between unsteady numerical predictions and steady-state results for two-phase detonation wave structure. Further, these comparisons conclusively show that all relevant detonation length scales are fully resolved, in contrast to most published work in this area, which is underresolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…While models of this kind arise in a number of applications, the context of deflagration-to-detonation transition in high-energy condensed-phase explosives provides the motivation for the present effort. A twophase continuum description of granular explosives has been provided by Baer and Nunziato [1]; also see the contemporaneous study of Butler and Krier [2], the earlier work of Gokhale and Krier [3], and the later papers of Powers, Stewart and Krier [4,5]. The model treats the explosive as a mixture of two phases, the unreacted granular solid and the gaseous product of combustion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could have an adverse effect on the compaction of the solid material. Similarly, Powers et al [16,17] neglected the nozzling terms, but did use a compressible solid.…”
Section: Multiphase Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%