1969
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.187.768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of Sputtering. I. Sputtering Yield of Amorphous and Polycrystalline Targets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
165
0
6

Year Published

1977
1977
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
165
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…At particle energies between 10 2 and 10 4 eV, the irradiation process is dominated by the nuclear collision cascade caused by impact 12,13 . Displaced atoms that reach the surface with enough kinetic energy to leave are permanently sputtered away; all other displaced atoms come to rest within the solid or on the surface after phonon emission times of ~10 − 12 s. These processes contribute prompt erosive 14,15 and prompt redistributive 11,16,17 components of morphology evolution and are collectively denoted P [x].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At particle energies between 10 2 and 10 4 eV, the irradiation process is dominated by the nuclear collision cascade caused by impact 12,13 . Displaced atoms that reach the surface with enough kinetic energy to leave are permanently sputtered away; all other displaced atoms come to rest within the solid or on the surface after phonon emission times of ~10 − 12 s. These processes contribute prompt erosive 14,15 and prompt redistributive 11,16,17 components of morphology evolution and are collectively denoted P [x].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In CSE variation of sputter yield with ion angle of incidence is the key factor that enables erosional sharpening 21 , but is insuffi cient for producing sharp tips on the atomic-scale. Th is limitation is overcome by FDSS, in which a positive probe bias is applied producing a repulsive potential and localized electric fi eld enhancement at the apex, such that impinging ions are defl ected and the eff ective ion energy upon impact, landing voltage, is the off set between accelerating voltage and probe bias.…”
Section: Fdss Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A surface atom at r = (x, y, h) is eroded with a probability proportional to the deposited energy E arising from the stopped ion. The spreading of energy is described by an anisotropic Gaussian [9] …”
Section: Continuum Theory and Monte Carlo Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%