Theory of open inclusive innovation for reciprocal, responsive and respectful outcomes: coping creatively with climatic and institutional risks

Abstract

Given the economic squeeze world over, search for what we call frugal grassroots innovations in Honey Bee Network, has become even more urgent and relevant in the recent years. And, to shape this search, models and concepts like open innovation, reverse innovation (GE, Market-Relevant Design: Making ECGs Available

The Effect of Open Innovation on Technology Value and Technology Transfer: A Comparative Analysis of the Automotive, Robotics, and Aviation Industries of Korea

“…Meanwhile, patents are directly used in diverse studies that measure various aspects of open innovation [30,31]. Shared intellectual property rights on patents usually occur as a result of collaboration, because shared intellectual property rights on patents occur when two or more assignees are found on a single patent application, and the intellectual property rights are indeed shared between the applicants listed in a joint patent application [32].…”

Connecting corporations and communities: Towards a theory of social inclusive open innovation

“…Whether corporations will follow an open innovation approach to blend grassroots ideas and innovations with their expertise in a reciprocal, responsible and respectful manner (Gupta et al 2016) is still an open question. The design of appropriate manufacturing and frugal supply chain will then become closely linked with other features of open innovation ecosystem.…”

“…The ecosystem for social open innovations provides scope for connecting corporations and communities (Herrera, 2015;Gibson-Graham and Roelvink 2013). Following the theory of reciprocal and responsible open innovation systems (Gupta et al 2016), we explore the way barriers are overcome on the way to reach the base of economic pyramid [BOEP] customer. Technological adaptability and institutional or market adaptability are explored to understand how communities get empowered to deal with corporations through an open innovation platform.…”

Framing Open Innovation in Start-Ups’ Incubators: A Complexity Theory Perspective

“…This paper presents a novel perspective on roles and paths in open innovation as it adopts the complexity concepts in the particular context of business incubators, conceptualized as a complex system where start-ups benefit from the access to multiple dedicated networks for advice and access to resources and knowledge sources. It contributes to the debate on the application of complexity principles to the open innovation research field by studying the conditions-in this case, the practices of the business incubators that enable a network-based innovation development for the creation of new value [5,23]. Results show how practices and services aimed to foster open innovation can enable one or more complexity principles if they cover a wider portfolio that encompasses infrastructure, business support services, and networking [8].…”

“…Hausberg and Korreck [9] argue that Open Innovation represents a promising theoretical lens in understanding the determinants and implications of business incubators. This kind of infrastructure sustains the creation and growth of new entrepreneurial teams by offering them access to purposive flows of knowledge and a supportive environment for experimentation and interdependence and, therefore, learning from the integration of this knowledge into the development of their business [21][22][23]. Indeed, an early involvement within the market dynamics can provide an important value to start-up teams for learning, creating partnerships and better developing the potential business, with the final aim of reducing the market and technical uncertainty [24] and accessing to knowledge networks and interorganizational networks [23].…”