1973
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/6/6/015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of nuclear spin interactions in ferromagnetic insulators. I. The thermodynamic properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hole-nuclear spin interaction is of type AI.S (A = hyperfine splitting constant, I = nuclear spin, S = hole spin). The correction due to this effect on exchange interaction has been calculated by Cottam et al [25]. who found it to be quite small and proportional to AT 1/2 .…”
Section: Orderparameter Of the Hole-pairmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Hole-nuclear spin interaction is of type AI.S (A = hyperfine splitting constant, I = nuclear spin, S = hole spin). The correction due to this effect on exchange interaction has been calculated by Cottam et al [25]. who found it to be quite small and proportional to AT 1/2 .…”
Section: Orderparameter Of the Hole-pairmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Our aim here is to study the strongly nonequilibrium regimes of spin motion. This problem is different from considering the equilibrium properties of coupled electron and nuclear spins [23][24][25][26]. An additional complication, in our case, arises from the coupling of spins with a resonator by means of the feedback equation (25).…”
Section: Scale Separation Approachmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Then Eqs. ( 22), (23), and (24) show that the variables s and |u| 2 are slow compared to the fast variable u. As the nuclear magnetic moment µ n is much smaller than that of an electron, µ e , we have the inequalities…”
Section: Scale Separation Approachmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In both cases, the resonant frequency falls from 4t to 3t at high stress where we have again neglected the population of the upper levels. This seems broadly consistent with the data points in figure 10(b) which suggest a rather weak dependence of w o on stress at least up to 1000 kgf cm-2 and to obtain a value of VTb we return to figure 5 which shows that at 1.8 K saturation is reached at 1000 kgf cm-2, We first consider V, < 0 and in calculating the energy levels we assume K(T2) has its limiting value of 6 and take s44 = 1.66 X lo-" m2 N-' (these values of the elastic constants are from Cottam and Saunders (1973)). The data suggest that 1 VTb 1 > 20 000 cm-' since for this value the separation of the lower two levels at 1000 kgf cm-' is only 79% of 3t so that saturation is still incomplete.…”
Section: Determination Of the Lattice Coupling Constants Veb And Vbmentioning
confidence: 99%