1972
DOI: 10.1029/wr008i004p01031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the water table

Abstract: A new analytical model is proposed for the delayed response process characterizing flow to a well in an unconfined aquifer. The present approach differs from that of Boulton [1954b, 1963, 1970] and Boulton and Pontin [1971] in that it is based only on well‐defined physical parameters of the aquifer system. Therefore it provides a possible physical explanation for the mechanism of delayed water table response and eliminates the conceptual difficulties encountered with Boulton's theory of ‘delayed yield from sto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
403
0
11

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 437 publications
(422 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
403
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional characterization approaches have adopted homogeneous conceptual models that assume aquifer homogeneity and have attempted to derive effective hydraulic parameters based on drawdowns from a single pumping test, for example, those by Theis [1935] and Cooper and Jacob [1946] for confined aquifers and those by Boulton [1963], Dagan [1967], Brutsaert [1970], Streltsova [1972aStreltsova [ , 1972b, Neuman [1972], Lakshminarayana and Rajagopalan [1978], Moench [1995], Mathias and Butler [2006], and Mishra and Neuman [2010] for unconfined aquifers. Recent numerical, sandbox, and field experiments by Wu et al [2005], Straface et al [2007], Xiang et al [2009], Wen et al [2010], Huang et al [2011], and Berg and Illman [2011b] however questioned the representativeness of the estimates from these conventional approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional characterization approaches have adopted homogeneous conceptual models that assume aquifer homogeneity and have attempted to derive effective hydraulic parameters based on drawdowns from a single pumping test, for example, those by Theis [1935] and Cooper and Jacob [1946] for confined aquifers and those by Boulton [1963], Dagan [1967], Brutsaert [1970], Streltsova [1972aStreltsova [ , 1972b, Neuman [1972], Lakshminarayana and Rajagopalan [1978], Moench [1995], Mathias and Butler [2006], and Mishra and Neuman [2010] for unconfined aquifers. Recent numerical, sandbox, and field experiments by Wu et al [2005], Straface et al [2007], Xiang et al [2009], Wen et al [2010], Huang et al [2011], and Berg and Illman [2011b] however questioned the representativeness of the estimates from these conventional approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydraulic properties were estimated using a type-curve fitting method according to the analytical solution of Neuman (1972Neuman ( , 1974Neuman ( , 1975 for an unconfined aquifer with delayed gravity response (specific yield). In this analysis, the wells can be either partially or fully penetrating.…”
Section: Constant-rate Injection Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the term aquifer storativity refers to the specific yield of the aquifer material, because the models were applied only to the late time drawdown data (e.g. Neuman 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%