2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-006-0156-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the streambed leakage concept in analytical models using data from three pumping tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 11 shows the simulation results that provided the best fit to the data for three monitoring depths below the land surface using T bc = 286 K and T rain = T wbt The agreement is good and the quality of the fit increases with increasing depth because subsurface heat transport is represented adequately and high‐frequency variations due to processes at the land surface are filtered out; however, T bc is 3 K larger than the value estimated from long‐term measurements and the literature. This might be explained by the applied assumptions, such as λ being independent of the moisture content, θ. Additionally, the location of T bc at 6‐m depth might still be too shallow because at this site there are strong surface water–groundwater interactions along drainage canals that might influence temperatures at greater depths (Constantz et al, 2002; Kollet and Zlotnik, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 11 shows the simulation results that provided the best fit to the data for three monitoring depths below the land surface using T bc = 286 K and T rain = T wbt The agreement is good and the quality of the fit increases with increasing depth because subsurface heat transport is represented adequately and high‐frequency variations due to processes at the land surface are filtered out; however, T bc is 3 K larger than the value estimated from long‐term measurements and the literature. This might be explained by the applied assumptions, such as λ being independent of the moisture content, θ. Additionally, the location of T bc at 6‐m depth might still be too shallow because at this site there are strong surface water–groundwater interactions along drainage canals that might influence temperatures at greater depths (Constantz et al, 2002; Kollet and Zlotnik, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a is expressed by dK a / K , where d [L] is the thickness of the streambed and K [L T −1 ] the hydraulic conductivity of the streambed. The retardation coefficient is inversely proportional to the streambed conductance per square meter C [T −1 ], defined as K / d [ Hantush , ; Kollet and Zlotnik , ]. The distance x represents the distance from the streambank.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some field studies have shown that a clear interface between the surface and subsurface is not always present (e.g., Bayani and A. (2003), Ghysels et al (2018), Kollet and Zlotnik (2003), Kollet and Zlotnik (2007)). Including the aquifer resistance is essential in such conditions.…”
Section: Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%